Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Americans fed up
- To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Marxism] Americans fed up
- From: Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 09:44:06 -0500
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
Poll Finds Americans Pessimistic, Want Change
War, Economy, Politics Sour Views of Nation's Direction
By Dan Balz and Jon Cohen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, November 4, 2007; A01
One year out from the 2008 election, Americans are deeply pessimistic
and eager for a change in direction from the agenda and priorities of
President Bush, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.
Concern about the economy, the war in Iraq and growing dissatisfaction
with the political environment in Washington all contribute to the
lowest public assessment of the direction of the country in more than a
decade. Just 24 percent think the nation is on the right track, and
three-quarters said they want the next president to chart a course that
is different than that pursued by Bush.
Overwhelmingly, Democrats want a new direction, but so do three-quarters
of independents and even half of Republicans. Sixty percent of all
Americans said they feel strongly that such a change is needed after two
terms of the Bush presidency.
Dissatisfaction with the war in Iraq remains a primary drag on public
opinion, and Americans are increasingly downcast about the state of the
economy. More than six in 10 called the war not worth fighting, and
nearly two-thirds gave the national economy negative marks. The outlook
going forward is also bleak: About seven in 10 see a recession as likely
over the next year.
The overall landscape tilts in the direction of the Democrats, but there
is evidence in the new poll -- matched in conversations with political
strategists in both parties and follow-up interviews with survey
participants -- that the coming battle for the White House is shaping up
to be another hard-fought, highly negative and closely decided contest.
At this point, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.), the Democratic
front-runner, holds the edge in hypothetical match-ups with four of the
top contenders for the Republican nomination. But against the two
best-known GOP candidates, former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani and
Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), her margins are far from comfortable. Not one
of the leading candidates in either party has a favorable rating above
51 percent in the new poll.
And while Clinton finds herself atop all candidates in terms of strong
favorability -- in the poll, 28 percent said they feel strongly
favorable toward her -- she also outpaces any other candidate on strong
unfavorables. More than a third, 35 percent, have strongly negative
views of her, more than 10 points higher than any other contender.
Overall, the public's sour mood is evident not only in the desire for a
change in direction but also in assessments of those who control the
reins of power in Washington. For the fourth consecutive month, Bush's
approval rating remains at a career low. Thirty-three percent said they
approve of the job he is doing, and 64 percent disapprove. Majorities
have disapproved of Bush's job performance for more than 2 1/2 years.
In follow-up interviews, people were quick to find fault with what they
see in Washington and to express their desire for something different.
"I think Bush has been extremely polarizing to the country," said Amber
Welsh, a full-time mother of three young children who lives in Davis,
Calif. "While I think it started before Bush, I think Bush has pushed it
even further. I think the next president needs to be one who brings us
together as a country."
Democrats can take little comfort in Bush's numbers, however. A year
after voters turned Republicans out of power in the House and the
Senate, approval of the Democratic-controlled Congress's performance is
lower than the president's rating, registering just 28 percent. That is
the lowest since November 1995, when Republicans controlled Congress and
the capital was paralyzed in a budgetary fight that shut down the
government.
Congressional Democrats now fare just slightly better. Only 36 percent
of those surveyed approve of the way they are handling their jobs, down
sharply from April when, 100 days into the new Congress, 54 percent said
they approved.
Whatever their dissatisfaction with the Democrats, however, a majority
of Americans, 54 percent, said they want the party to emerge from the
2008 election in control of Congress; 40 percent would prefer the GOP to
retake power. One reason is that 32 percent approve of congressional
Republicans, and in a series of other measures it becomes clear that the
eventual Republican nominee for president may be burdened by a tarnished
party label in the general election.
Thirty-nine percent of Americans said they now have a favorable
impression of the Republican Party, lower than at any point since
December 1998, when Republicans were in the midst of impeachment
proceedings against then-President Bill Clinton.
Among the GOP rank and file, Republican favorability has fallen 15
percentage points since March 2006 (from 93 percent to 78 percent). It
has dropped 19 points among independents, whose support for Democratic
candidates in last year's midterm elections contributed significantly to
GOP losses in the House and the Senate.
Only 23 percent of those surveyed said they want to keep going "in the
direction Bush has been taking us," and the appetite for change is as
high as it was in the summer of 1992, in the lead-up to Bill Clinton's
defeat of President George H.W. Bush. It is significantly higher than it
was in the summer of 2000 or the fall of 1988.
"We're in a terrible mess," said Jay Davis, who works on computers for
an insurance company and lives in Portland, Maine. "The war is an
incredible mistake, and it becomes more and more obvious. The economy is
just being propped up with toothpicks."
Jo Wright, a retired Episcopal priest from Vinita, Okla., said, "It just
seems that after these eight years most people think there's got to be a
change, and I'm with them."
Greg Coy, a 911 dispatcher who lives in Shippensburg, Pa., is less
pessimistic about the overall state of the country than Davis or Wright,
but he is unhappy with both the president and Congress. He voted for
Bush in 2000 and 2004, but he said: "If he came up again [for
reelection], I wouldn't vote for him. The last year I think he's dropped
something, and I'm not sure what it is."
Coy also offered a broader indictment of a political system he sees as
gridlocked by partisanship. "Here's the problem with this country," he
said. "Just because it's a Republican idea, Democrats don't like it, and
because it's a Democratic idea, Republicans don't like it. The Congress
should go with what works for this country. We have gotten away from that."
Justin Munro, a contractor from Reading, Pa., offered a less widely held
view of Bush's policies and the direction of the country. "I'm pretty
confident that time will prove that maybe going into Iraq was the right
thing to do," he said. He also believes that Bush has not gotten enough
credit on the economy: "I think we'll look back on that, too, and see
that the tax cuts were the right thing to do."
At this stage, three issues dominate the electoral landscape, with the
war in Iraq at the top of the list. Nearly half of all adults, 45
percent, cited Iraq as the most or second-most important issue in their
choice for president. About three in 10 cited the economy and jobs (29
percent) or health care (27 percent). All other issues are in the single
digits.
Iraq is tops across party lines, but Democrats are twice as likely as
Republicans to highlight health care as one of the two most important
issues for 2008 (34 percent to 16 percent). Health-care concerns peak
among African Americans: Twenty percent called it the election's most
important issue, and 38 percent said it is one of the top two.
While 12 percent of Republicans and 10 percent of independents cited
immigration as one of the top two issues, it was highlighted by 3
percent of Democrats. Terrorism is also a more prominent concern among
Republicans; 17 percent put it in their top two, while 3 percent of
Democrats did the same.
The Democratic Party holds double-digit leads over the GOP as the party
most trusted to handle the three most frequently cited issues for 2008:
Iraq, health care and the economy. The Democratic advantages on
immigration and taxes are narrower, and the parties are at rough parity
on terrorism, once a major Republican strong point.
There are other signs suggesting that the political landscape has become
less favorable to Republicans than it was at the beginning of Bush's
presidency. By 50 percent to 44 percent, Americans said they favor
smaller government with fewer services over bigger government with more
services -- long a key Republican argument. But support for smaller
government is significantly lower than it was before both the 2000 and
2002 elections.
In the new poll, support for allowing same-sex civil unions is up
significantly from 2004. A majority of respondents, 55 percent, now
support giving homosexual couples some of the legal rights of married
heterosexuals.
There is a more even divide on another hot-button issue: Fifty-one
percent would support a program giving illegal immigrants now living in
the United States the right to live here legally if they pay a fine and
meet other requirements; 44 percent would oppose that.
Strategists in both parties agree on the overall shape of the political
landscape a year from the 2008 election, but they differ as to how
voters will ultimately register their desire for change.
Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg said an electorate that took out its
anger on Republicans a year ago remains mad, with the hostility still
focused on the president's party.
Republican pollster Neil Newhouse said, "It is a political environment
pretty heavily tilted toward the Democrats." One hope, he added, is that
an early end to the GOP nominating battle will allow the winner time "to
put the current administration in the rearview mirror, placing the focus
on the nominee's candidacy and agenda."
Still, strategists on both sides foresee another close election. "The
biggest dynamic is that people want change from the policies of the Bush
administration," said Mark Penn, Hillary Clinton's chief strategist. But
he added that "it's not a clear path" to victory for the Democrats,
noting that no Democratic nominee has won 50 percent of the
general-election vote since Jimmy Carter in 1976.
Stuart Stevens, a media adviser to former Massachusetts governor Mitt
Romney, said no Republican candidate will argue next year that the
country is in great shape, but he discounted the effectiveness of
running against Bush in the fall of 2008. "A year from now, it's not
going to be a referendum on President Bush, it's going to be a choice
between two candidates," he said.
Much will happen in the coming months that could reshape the political
climate. But at this point, in a matchup of current front-runners,
Clinton and Giuliani are tightly paired: 50 percent of respondents would
support Clinton, 46 percent Giuliani. Against McCain, Clinton has a
clearer edge, 52 percent to 43 percent. She has even larger advantages
over former senator Fred D. Thompson of Tennessee (16 points) and Romney
(18 points), both of whom remain undefined in the eyes of many voters.
In each of these potential contests, Clinton has a big edge among women.
In a head-to-head with Giuliani, 56 percent of women would back Clinton,
and 40 percent would vote for Giuliani. By contrast, men would tilt
toward Giuliani 51 percent to 44 percent.
Independents, who fueled the Democratic takeover of Congress last
November, are evenly divided, 47 percent for Clinton, 46 percent for
Giuliani. The split is one indicator that, despite current Democratic
advantages and an electorate strongly oriented toward change, the 2008
election is likely to be closely and hotly contested.
The Post-ABC poll was conducted by telephone Oct. 29 to Nov. 1 among a
random sample of 1,131 adults, and includes additional interviews with
randomly selected African Americans for a total of 203 black
respondents. The results from the full poll have a margin of sampling
error of plus or minus three percentage points.
Polling analyst Jennifer Agiesta contributed to this report.
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] NYTimes.com: Thousands Rally Against Georgia's Once Popular President,
dbachmozart Sun 04 Nov 2007, 15:38 GMT
- [Marxism] NYTimes.com: You Are What Your Name Says You Are,
dbachmozart Sun 04 Nov 2007, 15:34 GMT
- [Marxism] The Bolsheviks and Rspect,
Louis Proyect Sun 04 Nov 2007, 14:56 GMT
- [Marxism] Petrocracy in Venezuela?,
Louis Proyect Sun 04 Nov 2007, 14:40 GMT
- [Marxism] Americans fed up,
Louis Proyect Sun 04 Nov 2007, 14:38 GMT
- [Marxism] Respect, a united front?!?!,
Louis Proyect Sun 04 Nov 2007, 14:05 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]