Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Twenty Theses on Sinn Fein's Strategy
Phil has written a number of articles in which he attempts to portray Sinn
Fein and the Republican movement as having 'sold out' and myself as covering
for them.
Before jumping to conclusions people should understand the situation in
Ireland sufficiently. The only person emailing facts was attacked for the
source of their facts - Phil would rather use epithets to conduct a
'marxist' analysis.
I don't have a huge amount of time to explain my take on things (insofar as
I can express it openly) but here goes...
1. Sinn Fein are as committed to achieving its ultimate objective of a
Thirty-two County Democratic Socialist Republic as it has ever been.
2. That narrow programme would probably garner no more than about 10% of the
total vote in a popular election either side of the border - socialism
itself right now is not a huge selling point in an Ireland which has just
experienced considerable growth as a result of an FDI-led growth spurt.
National feeling in the Free State is largely limited by an acknowledgement
of the need for the consent of a majority in the north for reunification.
Parties which stand on a strong socialist platform like the SWP get paltry
levels of support.
3. So logically, Sinn Fein must promote that agenda by the most effective
means possible: politics. In the context of the current 'agreement', Sinn
Fein believe that its political goals can be achieved through political (and
democratic) means. This is not a result of Sinn Fein lowering its standard
from revolutionary to reformist but as a direct result of the success of the
IRA's military campaign against the British. In a sense, the state is no
longer unassailable from within as it has been forced to accord equal
legitimacy to Sinn Fein's demands to those of bourgeois parties.
4. From this perspective, the northern state itself is a battle-ground. Sinn
Fein's entry into PSNI structures is a case-in-point where the party is
waging a determined struggle on a range of issues from the routine arming of
the PSNI to community-empowerment policing structures (CRJ). Elements within
the PSNI are struggling very hard to prevent that agenda. British MI5 as a
result of the negotiations has committed themselves to playing an external
role in that struggle.
5. All negotiations are a concretisation of struggle, they reflect the
relative balance of forces at the time of the negotiations themselves. That
is one reason why the process of Irish integration has grown rather than
shrunk over time - it reflects the growth of popular support for Sinn Fein
in electoral and political terms across the north and border counties.
6. Sinn Fein attract around 25-30% of the vote in the north currently.
Despite historically low levels of mass mobilisation or political engagement
across Irish society, Sinn Fein does still command a substantial mass level
of adherence. This is primarily because the party does not campaign directly
on its ultimate objective but on its immediate policy platform which is more
limited and focussed around Irish reunification. While the party has a
substantial vote, in reality, it ends up that the other parties who
constitute around 70% of electoral representation tend to side with those
elements within the state which wish to hold back radical change.
7. Despite the fact that other political parties represent little by way of
substance and SF as a representative political party 'punching above its
weight' - the party is badly outgunned across most sites of struggle because
other parties tend to end up effectively acting as conduits for the status
quo civil service agenda. The end result is that change has been less than
might be hoped for but a constant demand for change across all aspects of
local and regional government. However, the party is achieving greater
successes by linking outwards with civil society and popular opinion as its
agenda is largely 'populist' and as such the civil service agenda can be
confronted effectively where issues are opened out to the people.
8. Key to this is the trend within the party which emphasizes a strategic
commitment to participatory democracy and participatory forms of governance.
9. As with anything the development of the party in this direction is
combined and uneven.
10. The DUP which is currently acting as the bulwark of unionism is under
serious pressure from its grassroots from engaging with Republicans in a
power sharing administration and in all-Ireland institutions. This may or
may not have impacts on the viability of unionism in the medium-term.
11. SF has not accepted consent. However, the party has taken the step of
working within a system where consent is enshrined. This was the most
substantial compromise made by the party and some found it difficult to
accede to working in such a framework saying that this amounted to an
ideological commitment to consent. At the same time, the current
arrangements reflect the opinion of the bulk of Irish people and the
position of every single other party of substance in the island. No change
is possible without proceeding from the standpoint of the bulk of Irish
people - as such, the party has been forced to negotiate and act within a
framework outside itself. This is a substantial problem that radical critics
of Sinn Fein are in denial about - the people themselves do not view the
continued existence of the North as a British colony as illegal. As a
consequence military options do not have sufficient levels of support to be
sustainable. Indeed, it is likely that political options of rejecting the
Peace process will leave their adherents sidelined in political terms from
the action. The situation post-1998 is qualitatively different than previous
to it given the overwhelming support of the Irish people for the new
arrangements.
12. Economics lies largely in favour of Irish reunification. In terms of
Agriculture, Environment, the Economy and Energy the argument for
all-Ireland approaches is unassailable. Even hardened pro-British parties
like the DUP are now calling for the adoption of integration across these
sectors. Any such changes to the base will have tremendous impact on the
political super-structure over time. As Engels said, "According to the
materialistic conception of history, the production and reproduction of real
life constitutes in the last instance the determining factor of history."
13. Sinn Fein is not the only party to recognise this. The largest party of
the Free State (Fianna Fail) has indicated it will now actively pursue an
all-Ireland structure. Fianna Fail is the definitive party of the Irish big
bourgeoisie (mixing both comprador and national bourgeoisie elements). This
is reflective of the fact that the Free State [Dublin] Bourgeoisie recognise
that they have a natural interest in exploiting opportunities on an
all-Ireland scale. The rate of investment from Dublin to Belfast is
substantial and is supported by the Dublin Government pumping £600m into
infrastructure for the north. This money is not for nothing. Dublin is
preparing the ground for reunification on the back of economic integration.
14. This move north is on the back of Fianna Fail's success in hammering
Sinn Fein in the recent Free State elections. Fianna Fail decimated the left
in those elections - the SPI (CWI) which had a TD and was hoping for a
second lost their only seat. Sinn Fein went down from 5 TDs to 4 but this
reflected a failure to achieve grandiose targets of up to 15 seats. In
essence, this reflected the working class hopefully voting en-masse for the
party of the big bourgeoisie to retain 'the good times'. As such, it is a
transcient victory and Fianna Fail recognise that with its substantial
northern electoral base, Sinn Fein remain a serious threat to Fianna Fail -
largely because of that party's core support deriving from the working class
and the potential to lose a fraction of the (powerful) national bourgeoisie
to Sinn Fein - as has happened in the north.
15. Fianna Fail are also interested in the money. Sinn Fein despite its
limited achievements has remained as a bulwark against corruption and has
been very active driving an equality agenda. This does not suit big business
interests and Fianna Fail believe that Sinn Fein need to be and can be
attacked on their home ground.
16. While this represents a serious threat to Sinn Fein given the disparity
between the level of support for Sinn Fein's ultimate objectives of a
Socialist Republic and its current levels of political support, there are a
range of opportunities associated with Fianna Fail coming north. Not least
is that Fianna Fail will hasten Irish unity as they will be able to speak
more effectively to sections of unionism which see their loyalty as stemming
from material advantage. In the future, this economic-based loyalty to
Britain will be replaced by a more pragmatic attitude based on
profit-making. Given the all-Ireland economic dynamic this is a very
persuasive factor.
17. Sinn Fein contesting elections against Fianna Fail in the north will
also sharpen the party's own focus on what it stands for. Key to this is a
commitment to Equality and Participation. Equally, the struggle to
effectively democratise the Police through the accountability mechanisms
negotiated will assume greater importance in awakening wider consciousness
around the need for radical outcomes. Sinn Fein's work within institutions
and use of political power will inevitably and eventually contribute to a
radicalisation of Irish society, north and south, as cross-border
institutions bed down.
18. At the same time, power-sharing in the north has opened the door to Sinn
Fein engaging with unionism at grassroots levels and will accelerate the
process whereby working class unionists begin to challenge their political
affiliations to conservative parties. This process, however, is much more
involved than might be otherwise assumed. It reflects the strength of the
ideology of loyalism and sectarianism. In a sense, it is akin to countering
attitudes of racism in the US south.
19. The contours of the struggle are therefore complicated. It is guaranteed
that anyone without a comprehensive understanding of localised politics
based on practice will come unstuck if they attempt to apply simplistic
models to strategy. Ireland is divided artificially but this division is
reflected in popular consciousness. Ireland is at once a neo-colony and a
colony. Large sections of its indigenous working class are materially
privileged and have a material interest in maintaining this relative
privilege. That situation is doubly complicated in the north. I seriously
doubt whether Sinn Fein will be taking any advice from groups or individuals
who have been signally ineffective in advancing their struggle in their own
countries.
20. Sinn Fein's entry into institutions cannot be disservered from the
success of the IRA's military campaign. This campaign has opened the state
up for struggle. Effectively, SF are engaged in a war of position with
elements from within the state itself and other political trends. The
British Government, itself composed of various trends, retains a material
interest in Ireland as expressed variously by the Northern Ireland Office,
British MI5, etc. The direct interest of the British Government, in
particular its Treasury, in curtailing moves towards further devolution or
independence is related to its struggle to contain Scottish demands for
Independence. None of these factors are simply coterminous and they can be
contradictory. All of which makes for a variety of viewpoints.
Nothing is guaranteed for Sinn Fein and the Republican movement. The state
itself may be able to withstand Republicans and tie down their struggle for
years. However, I doubt this given the economic and political trends we see
manifesting themselves today. Similarly, Sinn Fein remains focussed on its
goals so let us hope they are successful. If not, Eirigi is performing a
useful task in collecting all those individuals who find that they cannot
believe in the current strategy so I wish them well too. If Sinn Fein is to
succeed, it will need all the allies it can get in prosecuting the struggle.
I hope that this explains things a little more than Phil's simplistic
rantings about Sinn Fein's engagement in a capitalist state and just giving
up on the freedom struggle.
Le meas,
DoC
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] letter to eric asimov,
MICHAEL YATES Thu 27 Sep 2007, 16:35 GMT
- [Marxism] Me at Brecht Forum,
MICHAEL YATES Thu 27 Sep 2007, 14:43 GMT
- [Marxism] watch Evo on John Stewart's Daily Show,
Fred Fuentes Thu 27 Sep 2007, 14:00 GMT
- [Marxism] New Titles by Fredric Jameson,
Rowan Wilson Thu 27 Sep 2007, 11:52 GMT
- [Marxism] Twenty Theses on Sinn Fein's Strategy,
Domhnall Ó Cobhthaigh Thu 27 Sep 2007, 11:31 GMT
- [Marxism] Verizon rejects messages from NARAL supporting abortion rights,
Fred Feldman Thu 27 Sep 2007, 05:12 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Bollinger "embarrasing and offensive",
Fred Feldman Thu 27 Sep 2007, 05:06 GMT
- [Marxism] Brazil, Venezuela move forward with energy ventures,
Walter Lippmann Thu 27 Sep 2007, 04:46 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]