[Marxism] The truth about Anbar

[Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>]

NY Times, September 16, 2007
Op-Ed Contributor
What They’re Saying in Anbar Province
By GARY LANGER

IN his address to the nation on Thursday, President Bush singled out 
progress in Anbar Province as the model for United States success in 
Iraq. The president’s claims echoed those made earlier in the week by 
Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top American commander in Iraq, in his 
Congressional testimony. And they raised a question worth examining: Do 
United States military alliances with Sunni tribal leaders truly reflect 
a turning of hearts and minds away from Anbar’s bitter anti-Americanism?

The data from our latest Iraq poll suggest not.

Al Qaeda, it should be said, is overwhelmingly — almost unanimously — 
unpopular in Anbar, as it is in the rest of Iraq. But our enemies’ 
enemies are not necessarily our friends. The United States, it turns 
out, is equally unpopular there.

In a survey conducted Aug. 17-24 for ABC News, the BBC and NHK, the 
Japanese broadcaster, among a random national sample of 2,212 Iraqis, 72 
percent in Anbar expressed no confidence whatsoever in United States 
forces. Seventy-six percent said the United States should withdraw now — 
up from 49 percent when we polled there in March, and far above the 
national average.

Withdrawal timetable aside, every Anbar respondent in our survey opposed 
the presence of American forces in Iraq — 69 percent “strongly” so. 
Every Anbar respondent called attacks on coalition forces “acceptable,” 
far more than anywhere else in the country. All called the United 
States-led invasion wrong, including 68 percent who called it 
“absolutely wrong.” No wonder: Anbar, in western Iraq, is almost 
entirely populated by Sunni Arabs, long protected by Saddam Hussein and 
dispossessed by his overthrow.

There are critical improvements in Anbar. Most important have been 
remarkable advances in confidence in the Iraqi Army and police. In ABC’s 
survey in March, not a single respondent rated local security positively 
— now 38 percent do. Nonetheless, nobody surveyed in Anbar last month 
gave the United States any credit. Ratings of living conditions remain 
dismal: respondents were deeply dissatisfied with the availability of 
electricity and fuel, jobs, medical care and a host of other elements of 
daily life. And the violence, while sharply down, has hardly ended: One 
in four reported that car bombs or suicide attacks had occurred near 
them in the last six months. Last week’s murder of Abdul Sattar Buzaigh 
al-Rishawi, an Anbar sheik who had allied himself with the United 
States, only underscored this grim reality.

Anbar’s tribal leaders may have any number of motivations for their 
alliance with the United States. It’s been reported that the United 
States government has provided them arms, matériel and money, as well as 
undertaking more than $700 million in reconstruction projects in the 
province.

But it seems clear that popular sentiment in Anbar is another matter 
entirely. Indeed, one other result from our poll may be of particular 
interest to Anbar’s tribal leaders and the United States military alike: 
Just 23 percent in Anbar expressed confidence in their “local leaders”; 
77 percent had little or none. That’s better than it was in March — but 
still nearly the lowest level of confidence in local leaders we measured 
anywhere in Iraq.

Confidence in local leaders, as it happens, is lower only in Diyala — 
the other province Mr. Bush mentioned in his speech as a focal point of 
progress in Iraq.

Gary Langer is the director of polling for ABC News.

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism