Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] Cynthia McKinney Supports Reconstruction Party
- To: "Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition" <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Marxism] Cynthia McKinney Supports Reconstruction Party
- From: David Picón Álvarez <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:39:21 +0200
From: "Louis Proyect" <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>
> Is this supposed to be a Marxist objection to the Greens?
Yes. Of course there are insane Greens and less insane Greens, so my
objections might not apply to all of them. As a general rule, though, they
don't seem particularly willing to let the forces of production be
developed.
> Controlling nature? An infelicitous expression, to be sure.
What is wrong with controlling nature? It is a perfectly valid expression of
what, IMO, is a Marxist value: to be able to dispose things to the
satisfaction of the people as a whole. That requires, in essence, overcoming
randomness to the extent that it is possible, and utilizing natural
resources for human ends. There's a rhetorical point to make that
controlling nature might not sound good, but it is what there is to be done,
in essence.
--David.
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]