[Marxism] Judge stays rule requiring employers to fire illegal immigrants

["Mike Friedman" <mikedf@xxxxxxxx>]

Judge stays rule requiring employers to fire illegal immigrants
Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer


A federal judge in San Francisco blocked the Bush administration Friday
from imposing a rule requiring employers to fire workers identified as
illegal immigrants in government records or face possible prosecution.

U.S. District Judge Maxine Chesney granted a nationwide temporary
restraining order sought by the AFL-CIO and affiliated unions to keep the
government from sending letters to employers demanding that they clear up
workers' citizenship status.

The order will be in effect until Oct. 1, when another federal judge will
consider whether to grant an injunction that would block the rule until a
trial on the unions' lawsuit against the government is held.

Chesney said there was a serious question about whether the Bush
administration's planned crackdown on illegal workers was authorized by
law. She also said the government would suffer little inconvenience from a
delay, compared with the hardship to employees who might be improperly
identified as illegal immigrants.

Officials had planned to send the first warning letters Tuesday and mail
140,000 letters to employers by Nov. 9.

Justice Department lawyer Daniel Bensing told Chesney that the government
wants the issue resolved before Sept. 14, when the new rule was scheduled
to take effect and objected to a delay until at least October. But he did
not indicate any intention to challenge the judge's order.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff announced the rule Aug. 10 as
a means of toughening the little-enforced 1986 law that subjects employers
to criminal prosecution or civil penalties for knowingly employing illegal
immigrants.

Employers now can satisfy the law if they obtain specified identification
documents from newly hired workers. After that, the government notifies
employers if the Social Security number on a worker's W-2 tax form doesn't
match the number in the Social Security database. That employee might not
have earnings credited for Social Security benefits, but no action is
taken against the employer.

Under the new rule, employers receiving such a "no-match" letter would
have to fire the worker or face possible civil fines and criminal
penalties if the discrepancy isn't cleared up within 90 days. The change
would be likely to have the greatest effect in California, where several
industries employ large numbers of undocumented workers.

The unions argued that past experience with no-match letters shows that
they are often sent mistakenly because of clerical errors by employers or
the government in recording numbers or because of name changes after a
marriage, divorce or other reasons.

The AFL-CIO also said Social Security was never intended to be a means of
tracking down undocumented immigrants and is so cumbersome that legal
employees will be unable to clear up discrepancies in 90 days.

The unions argued that the 1986 law, which prohibited employers from
knowingly employing illegal immigrants, required only a document check for
newly hired workers, and did not authorize the government to order
additional verification after hiring.

Government lawyers said the new rule is consistent with the 1986 law, and
merely gave employers an additional way to resolve uncertainties about
their employees' immigration status and avoid liability.

The rule was drafted and circulated for comment more than a year ago and
lay dormant until Chertoff's Aug. 10 announcement. Bensing, the
government's lawyer, said Friday that the administration had held off
while awaiting congressional action on a comprehensive immigration bill
and activated the regulation only after the bill was defeated.

Chesney said her decision to block the rule didn't necessarily mean she
thinks it is illegal. But she told Bensing that it would be important for
the government to present evidence showing a connection between a no-match
letter and "a reasonable inference that the person is here illegally."

Lawyers for the unions said they were encouraged.

"We're confident that the rule will be struck down," said attorney Scott
Kronland.


E-mail Bob Egelko at begelko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

This article appeared on page A - 3 of the San Francisco Chronicle





________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism