Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Oppose the Indo-US Nuclear Deal and 123 Agreement: Press release
So, what I get from this group, ABOLITION 2000, is that they *support*
the US imposed ban on the sale of nuclear technology to India based on
*US laws* about non-proliferation. They are in favor of the US using
it's imperialist might to dictate who can and cannot use nuclear
technology. Sukla, does this bother you at all?
Naveem, you could well be correct about your view of the strategic
military aspects of this agreement. Clearly the dynamic of the US-India
relationship has been improving for the US. Obviously the irony of the
visit by a US nuclear powered and armed air-craft carrier being escorted
by fly-byes by the Indian Air Force with Russian made MIGs can't be lost
on any one.
That the motivation for the whole agreement is military is still
something that is very highly speculative and unprovable (not to say
it's wrong, just that you couldn't really prove it). One of the problems
one gets into is that the excuse of non-proliferation is being used to
stymie legitimate development of nuclear energy. The same argument could
be used against any country that wants to use nuclear energy. The facts
are that India already had the bomb and it has a sophisticated nuclear
energy infrastructure.
I've already received numerous e-mails (as I did last time this came up
a month ago) from Indians who hold my position on this: no to nuclear
bombs, yes to nuclear energy, or at least separating the issues. Even
though, being a Yankee anti-imperialist, I have to defend the right of
the Indian *nation* to pursue nuclear weapons, at least until the US and
other NATO countries ALSO agree to disarm...otherwise there really isn't
a discussion. But even this is secondary, politically speaking, to the
issue of the right of India not to be pushed around by the US Congress
and Dept. of State. This deal was cut by the Indian gov't essentially
begging the US to set it free from constraints in nuclear trade while
actually reimposing other constraints.
David
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] land use and global warming (was: Freeman Dyson ...), (continued)
- [Marxism] Endless struggle for ideas and diversity in revolutionary Cuba,
Walter Lippmann Wed 15 Aug 2007, 19:41 GMT
- [Marxism] Why put the left's efforts into a Third Party, Greens or otherwise?,
Anthony Boynton Wed 15 Aug 2007, 19:10 GMT
- [Marxism] P/E ratio,
Louis Proyect Wed 15 Aug 2007, 19:02 GMT
- [Marxism] Oppose the Indo-US Nuclear Deal and 123 Agreement: Press release,
David Walters Wed 15 Aug 2007, 18:09 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] [CubaNews] The True Left In Hollywood,
Shane Mage Wed 15 Aug 2007, 17:12 GMT
- [Marxism] Verso London Event - Voice of Hezbollah: The Statements of Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah,
Rowan Wilson Wed 15 Aug 2007, 17:06 GMT
- [Marxism] International Ecosocialist Meeting: Update #2,
Ian Angus Wed 15 Aug 2007, 16:47 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]