Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] The State of Racism
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 11:45:24 -0400 "Sayan Bhattacharyya"
<ok.president+marxmail@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 8/12/07, Joaquin Bustelo <jbustelo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
> >
> > To survive, capitalism MUST BE a system NOT JUST of capitalist
> CLASS
> > supremacy, but also of MALE and WHITE supremacy. Because, to
> prevent the
> > coherence among sellers of labor power, the worker must enter not
> just as a
> > seller of abstract human labor, but as the seller of white labor,
> or male
> > labor or even Black or Latino labor but within an imperialist
> country. If
> > labor power is allowed to become generic, then the worker --all
> workers--
> > really have nothing to lose but the identical chains they all
> wear. Hence
> > the KEY QUESTION -- how do you stop labor power from becoming
> generic? And
> > that, it seems to me, requires making certain goods and services,
> or sectors
> > of the economy, monopolies of the imperialist countries, which
> allows for
> > superprofits. And, of course, it is absolutely essential to
> prevent the
> > emergence of a world market for labor power.
>
> Joaquin,
>
> It certainly seems reasonable to suggest that for capitalists _as a
> class_ this is important to achieve (i.e. preventing labor power
> from
> "becoming generic").
>
> But, in order to achieve this, capitalists would need to coordinate
> this among themselves. Why? Because this is something that matters
> to
> capitalists _as a class_, but does not matter so much to individual
> capitalists.
>
> The _individual_ factory owner is better off hiring and paying any
> skilled labor they can find, be it black, white, male or female, as
> long as the job will get done well.
>
> So, you'll probably have to posit some mechanism whereby the
> necessity
> for capitalists to maintain racial discrimination _as a class_
> translates into hiring decision patterns of _individual_ companies.
>
> There is an incentive to discriminate at the level of capitalists as
> a
> class. We will need to figure out how that incentive (absent a
> wilful
> conspiracy) translates into incentives to discriminate, for
> individual
> firms.
The economist John Roemer has been working on
this issue for a number of years.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Roemer
http://econpapers.repec.org/article/rjebellje/v_3A10_3Ay_3A1979_3Ai_3Aaut
umn_3Ap_3A695-705.htm
http://ideas.repec.org/p/ums/papers/2005-15.html
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] The State of Racism,
Anthony Boynton Sat 11 Aug 2007, 23:32 GMT
- [Marxism] On surveillance: would you buy used-up credibility from this president?,
Ralph Johansen Sat 11 Aug 2007, 22:49 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Marxism Digest, Vol 46, Issue 26,
Dbachmozart Sat 11 Aug 2007, 20:17 GMT
- [Marxism] 8/13:Waiting Till the Midnight Hour,
kazembe Sat 11 Aug 2007, 16:54 GMT
- [Marxism] Tim Wise: Home Runs, Heroes and Hypocrisy (Re: Barry Bonds),
wenhuadageming Sat 11 Aug 2007, 16:48 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]