[Marxism] "Cui bono", or "quis"?

["Nestor Gorojovsky" <nestorgoro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:14:37 -0700
> From: Eli Stephens <elishastephens@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Marxism] IRAQ: Extraordinary interview with
> pro-resistance        Iraqi  Nationalis
> To: marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> "qui bono" is a very good question to ask. But it doesn't
> automatically provide the answer.

Isn't "cui bono" (good for whom) the single _politically useful_ 
question?

Doesn't the long debate around the "quis" (that is, the how) detour 
us from our objective?

I guess that if I were living in USAmerica, I would simply disregard 
the question of the making of horror. 

Este correo lo ha enviado
Néstor Miguel Gorojovsky
nestorgoro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[No necesariamente es su autor]
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
"La patria tiene que ser la dignidad arriba y el regocijo abajo".
Aparicio Saravia
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 



________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism