[Marxism] Doom of imperialism

[Philip Stein <ggps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Perhaps this is a bit of a change of subject but I find it hard to not get
the impression that the Marxist¹s of the list are acting as left
gatekeepers (perhaps in a conspiratorial manner) to block any information
that the cause of the destruction of the three towers was the result of an
inside job and not that of a nomad sitting cross legged with a laptop in a
cave in Afghanistan. Right here I would like to mention when I attended the
Legacy of Marx Symposium and celebration in Havana in May of 2003 I met a
number of the Marxist scholars. Whether they are on this list I don¹t know,
however they should pay some attention. I mention this to attempt to ward
off the insulting epithets, such as ³conspiracy nuts² and worse whenever
this subject is brought up.

A mountain of evidence has been now codified which Marxists here
inexplicably serve as left gatekeepers refusing to allow permission for this
evidence to appear and be subject to refutation. If I may, I will mention a
brief example from that mountain of evidence. A brief  video was just
compiled and released of bombs exploding in buildings 1,2 and 7 with
witnesses including firemen describing the explosions in the three
buildings. Mind you the 47 story tower, building 7, was not struck by an
airplane yet 7 hours after Buildis 1 and 2 came down in a pile of poison
dust, 7 too came down in the same manner. Controlled demolition has been the
only rational and scientific explanation for the collapse of the 3 towers.
In fact building 7 was completely ignored in the official 911 Report. It
cannot be explained except by controlled demolition. Of course there are
many other links to the event to even think of bringing up here.

Basically what we have here is one of the important tactics of the most
powerful imperialist nation attempting to consolidate its complete and
universal control of the planet earth. Why was going to this  extreme of
pulling off this  highly sophisticated and technically advanced crime
necessary? As is commonly known now the neocoms were calling for a new Pearl
Harbor to rally the support of the American people. But then too there was
the problem of staving off the coming collapse of capitalism.

This can be supported by some brief words pertaining to imperialism as
expressed in the Dictionary of Philosophy (International Publishers, New
York): 

³In the conditions of confrontation with socialism the ruling classes of the
capitalist countries as never before dread a transformation of the class
struggle into mass revolutionary movement. For the sake of consolidating its
positions, increasing the effectiveness and rate of economic growth, for
intensifying the workers¹ exploitation, the monopolies make a wide use of
the achievements of the scientific and technological revolution and of
state-monopoly capitalism. However, the latter is unable to solve the main
contradiction of capitalism; it is a specific form of the movement and
aggravation of this contradiction, thus testifying to the historical doom of
imperialism.²

Philip Stein 
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism