Re: [Marxism] Cockburn deals with the Larouche problem

[Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sayan Bhattacharyya wrote:

> But if we discount IAEA on account of being a "notoriously pro-nuke"
> outfit, by the same token we also have to skeptical about Slater,
> whose article you quote, since Slater is described thus at the end of
> the article:
> 
> "ALICE SLATER is a founder of Abolition 2000, a global network working
> for a treaty to eliminate nuclear weapons and is the Co-Convenor of the
> Abolition 2000 Working Group for Sustainable Energy."
> 
> To the extent that IAEA is "notoriously pro-nuke", doesn't Abolition
> 2000 qualify as "notoriously anti-nuke"?

No wonder you keep clashing with people here. You seem to subscribe to 
some kind of bizarre idea about "objectivity". You can, for example, be 
notoriously anti-immigration but the term "notoriously pro-immigration" 
does not make sense on a Marxism list. Of course, this distinction would 
be lost on you as my moderation instructions would indicate.

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism