Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Decline of the West
- To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Marxism] Decline of the West
- From: Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:18:03 -0400
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
NY Times, June 13, 2007
Culture
Alas, Poor Art Market: A Multimillion-Dollar Head Case
By ALAN RIDING
LONDON, June 7 — Presumably it was pure coincidence.
On June 4 the former Liberian gangster and strongman Charles G. Taylor
went on trial in The Hague for war crimes in which diamond trafficking
played a major role. Just days earlier the British artist Damien Hirst
unveiled a platinum human skull covered in 8,601 diamonds and offered it
for sale for £50 million, or close to $100 million.
But if coincidence, is it fair to make the link? Should every
starry-eyed young couple looking for an engagement ring have to worry
about how diamonds are mined in Africa? Need Mr. Hirst feel guilty that
Mr. Taylor is charged with supplying weapons to gangs terrorizing Sierra
Leone in the 1990s in exchange for diamonds?
Mr. Hirst’s London gallery, White Cube, thought it wise to address the
issue, noting that the skull’s diamonds “are all ethically sourced, each
with written guarantees in compliance with United Nations resolutions.”
Bentley & Skinner, the Mayfair jewelers that made the skull, added the
assurance that the diamonds were “conflict-free.”
So that’s fine.
The concept of ethically sourced diamonds — or oil or weapons or even
imported T-shirts — may be a bit far-fetched, but it sufficed to turn
news media attention here away from human rights to the far more
respectable subject of money: if sold, Mr. Hirst’s skull will be the
most expensive new work of art ever made.
Now that’s the stuff of headlines.
It is no secret that the art market has become drunk with money lately,
with major auctions routinely raising record prices for artists old and
new. Never before have contemporary artists, from London to Leipzig, New
York to Shanghai, been at the center of such speculative fever.
But $100 million for a diamond skull that cost $23.6 million (£12
million) to make? Even Russian oligarchs and hedge-fund billionaires
might think twice. The work, by the way, is called “For the Love of
God.” Indeed.
Still, along with chutzpah, it shows that Mr. Hirst is a shining symbol
of our times, a man who perhaps more than any artist since Andy Warhol
has used marketing to turn his fertile imagination into an extraordinary
business. And as the natural leader of a group that came to be known as
the Young British Artists, or Y.B.A.’s, who emerged here in the 1990s,
he has paved the way for many others.
He made his name by pickling sharks, cows, sheep and the like, but his
real achievement was to break the power of London’s traditional
galleries. Initially sponsored by the dealer and collector Charles
Saatchi, himself a former advertising magnate, Mr. Hirst soon became an
art entrepreneur in his own right. And having created his brand, he
found he could sell almost anything.
Now 42, he still pickles animals in formaldehyde, but he also sells spin
paintings, enlarged anatomical figures, pharmaceutical products
displayed in cupboards, butterfly collages and, in White Cube’s current
“Beyond Belief” show, which includes the diamond skull, paintings of the
birth of his son through Caesarean section and large oils of malignant
tumors.
Apart from their salability and the fact that many of these works are
made by Mr. Hirst’s studio assistants (or his jewelers), what they have
in common, White Cube tells us, is his exploration of “the fundamental
themes of human existence — life, death, truth, love, immortality and
art itself.”
Thus “For the Love of God” is presented in the tradition of memento mori
— those skulls placed in classical paintings to remind us of what lies
ahead — and as a homage to the Aztecs (Mr. Hirst now spends part of
every year in Mexico), who attached precious stones to skulls and even
made entire skulls with crystal.
In other words, Mr. Hirst’s piece is packaged as a concept.
It is also an object. Seen under a single spotlight in a darkened room
of White Cube’s Mayfair gallery, the skull is entirely covered with
small diamonds, including the nostrils, while one mega-diamond, weighing
52.40 carats, sits on its forehead.
We are told that the skull belonged to a European who died at about 35,
sometime between 1720 and 1810. His cranium — or rather its platinum
cast — now sparkles like a strobe ball in a disco.
Is it beautiful? Compared with what? Like the crown jewels, it is what
it is: a highly skilled exercise in extravagance. Knowing its asking
price adds to its wow factor: imagine opening a suitcase with a $100
million worth of bills. Wow!
And talking (again) of money, White Cube says that three or four
collectors have shown interest in acquiring the skull. And one,
according to British news media reports, is the pop singer George Michael.
But those who lack resources or security guards have not been forgotten:
Mr. Hirst is offering limited editions of silkscreen prints of it,
costing from $2,000 to $20,000. (The most expensive 250 prints are
sprinkled with diamond dust.)
Well, clearly museums that are reduced to selling postcards, T-shirts
and coffee mugs of Renaissance masterpieces have something to learn.
But in fairness, Mr. Hirst is just playing the game. It is a game played
by collectors and dealers at art fairs throughout the year; it is a game
finessed as never before by Sotheby’s and Christie’s; it is a game in
which, in the words of Nick Cohen, a rare British journalist to trash
Mr. Hirst’s publicity coup, “the price tag is the art.”
Will the bubble burst? If it does, it will be no fault of the artists;
it will be because stock markets take a dive, and collectors retrench.
But it may do art itself no harm. Mr. Cohen, for one, is looking forward
to the day Mr. Hirst takes a fall.
Mr. Hirst “isn’t criticizing the excess, not even ironically,” Mr. Cohen
wrote in The Evening Standard here, “but rolling in it and loving it.
The sooner he goes out of fashion, the better.”
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] No academic left behind!,
Carl Webb Wed 13 Jun 2007, 21:43 GMT
- [Marxism] Long live infidel Izmir!,
Louis Proyect Wed 13 Jun 2007, 19:46 GMT
- [Marxism] Ostalgie,
Louis Proyect Wed 13 Jun 2007, 19:44 GMT
- [Marxism] Decline of the West,
Louis Proyect Wed 13 Jun 2007, 19:08 GMT
- [Marxism] Michael Moore: "No room for the concept of profit!",
Eli Stephens Wed 13 Jun 2007, 18:39 GMT
- [Marxism] Venezuela banks profit under Chávez,
Walter Lippmann Wed 13 Jun 2007, 16:25 GMT
- [Marxism] George Monbiot's latest on Alexander Cockburn,
Louis Proyect Wed 13 Jun 2007, 16:24 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]