[Marxism] Karl Marx Is Back, and Punting on Chinese Stocks (Bloomberg)

[Bradley Bauerly <BAUERLY@xxxxxx>]

By William Pesek

June 6 (Bloomberg) -- Karl Marx is back in China, and the philosopher is 
arguably bigger than ever. 

Yes, yes, Asia's No. 2 economy is barreling ahead on the free-market highway. 
Beijing has even gotten hip to the private- equity craze, buying a $3 billion 
stake in Blackstone Group LP. Now that, as Milton Friedman might say, is 
capitalism. 

It's interesting, then, that China's markets in some respects are looking more 
like the kinds envisioned by Marx than by laissez-faire champion Friedman. 

Mao Zedong fancied himself an heir to Marx. Today, when investors look at 
China's 11 percent growth and domestic reforms, the Marxist theory China 
subscribed to back in the 20th century seldom comes to mind. 

And were Marx to visit modern-day China, he might be distressed to see how the 
rich are flourishing and a sizeable portion of gross domestic product comes 
from private companies, while the poor need to pay for education and health 
care. China also hopes one day to arrive at a system where markets control the 
prices of goods, production and labor. 

Yet something about China's spectacular stock rally has Marx written all over 
it. 

One of the German-born philosopher's main worries about free markets was a 
``reserve army of labor,'' a huge labor pool that would prevent wages from 
rising and benefit only corporations that exploited workers. In today's China, 
a reserve army of individual investors is stepping forward to boost stock 
prices. 

Ignoring Greenspan 

Perhaps it's not surprising that investors jumping into Shanghai's markets 
ignored Alan Greenspan's recent prediction of a ``dramatic contraction.'' It's 
doubtful many of the hundreds of thousands of Chinese opening trading accounts 
each day have heard of the former Federal Reserve chairman -- or care what he 
thinks. 

They're too busy engaging in their own interpretation of Marx's belief that a 
worker's revolution is best for society. Only this revolution is more about 
China's poor masses catching up to the nouveau riche in Shanghai, Beijing and 
Guangzhou. 

Would Marx really object? After all, if China's stock rally increases household 
wealth for laborers and makes the nation more egalitarian, doesn't the end 
justify the means? Would he object to workers making huge profits with little 
actual work, instead of the other way around? 

Marx might mind once China's stock bubble bursts, taking away the hard-earned 
wages of the country's modern-day equivalent of peasants. 

Hottest Casino 

What's so amazing about the surge in the benchmark CSI 300 Index is that 
everyone knows it's a bubble and regardless, fresh money flows into shares. 
China's companies may lack transparency, but its investors sure don't. Quite 
transparently, they're rolling the dice in the world's hottest casino. 

Just as a 9.2 percent plunge on Feb. 27 was seen as a buying opportunity, 
Monday's 7.7 percent drop merely brought new demand into the market. It's a 
bubble, and legions of Chinese workers opening investment accounts don't care. 

Critics of Marxism -- Nobel laureate Friedman among them -- argue capitalism is 
a more efficient means of creating and distributing wealth. They believe the 
gap between rich and poor in industrializing economies, which so troubled Marx, 
is a temporary phenomenon that capitalism eventually fixes. 

The irony is that Chinese workers are using the ultimate expression of 
capitalism -- stock speculation -- to narrow the gap between haves and 
have-nots. In other words, they're using Friedman to get closer to what Marx 
wanted. 

Capitalism or Socialism? 

Officials in Beijing may do the opposite. There can be little doubt China's 
government, armed with $1.2 trillion of currency reserves, will step in to 
stabilize the market if it really crashes. Hong Kong did it in the late 1990s 
with few lasting side effects. And Japan rarely shies away from financial 
socialism when the Nikkei 225 Stock Average plunges. 

Expect similar steps in China. For now, new investors hoping to strike it rich 
are propping up stocks like some huge, multi- million-person pyramid scheme. 
Such manias work out for those who get in early. It's those who join late that 
often experience big losses. And make no mistake -- this will end badly for 
many. 

Chinese authorities want it both ways -- capitalism and socialism. They want 
the stock bubble to stop inflating; they don't want it to explode, slamming 
business and consumer confidence. Hence the timidity one observes in the halls 
of Chinese power. 

China may raise lending and deposit rates at least once more this year to cool 
investment and curb asset bubbles, according to a survey of 16 economists by 
Bloomberg reporter Nipa Piboontanasawat. 

China must act more forcefully if it's going to stop money from record trade 
surpluses from fueling stock or property bubbles and overcapacity in 
manufacturing. That's especially true when inflation is outpacing after-tax 
returns on bank deposits, encouraging the speculation that's driven the CSI 300 
70 percent higher this year. 

None of this is likely to stop China's reserve army of investors from betting 
it all in Shanghai. It's not clear that either Friedman or Marx would approve. 


http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&refer=columnist_pesek&sid=aS1ymHqJh_xU


________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism