Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] How Turkey's Islamic party serves US imperialism
New Left Review 44, March-April 2007
Analysing the current hegemony of Erdogan?s AKP
in Turkey, Cihan Tug(al argues that the party has
been the agent of a classic passive revolution,
effectively shoring up the Kemalist state.
Paradoxes of ?Americanization with Muslim
characteristics?, against the backdrop of Western
military intervention in the Middle East.
CIHAN TUGAL
NATO?S ISLAMISTS
Hegemony and Americanization in Turkey
This changing balance of forces was a crucial
determinant in the Islamists? shift towards a
thorough-going Americanization. The term is used
here to mean not only political support for
Washington and the global capitalist order, but a
much broader allegiance to American economic,
social and religious models. If the first two of
these have always been dear to the establishment
elite in Turkey, the Islamists? breakthrough
would lie in naturalizing a new version of all
three of them among much broader layers.
After the crisis of 1997, when it became clear
that larger concessions were necessary to win the
toleration of the ruling elite, a new generation
of Islamists began to challenge Erbakan?s
leadership. In the late 1980s and early 1990s,
this generational conflict had been expressed as
a clash between ardent young radicals and a more
conservative mainstream. After 1997, the former
radicals were quick to adopt a free-market,
?moderate Muslim? position. Prominent among them
were R. Tayyip Erdogan, Abdullah Gül and Bülent
Arinç, all of them differentiated from the old
guard by their professionalism, media savvy and
attentiveness to the pro-business agenda.
Erdog(an, though his family was from the city of
Rize in the Black Sea region, was born in
Istanbul in 1957 and raised in the run-down
neighbourhood of Kasimpasa, where he attended an
Imam-Hatip school. A university graduate and
soccer player, he has honed his charisma during
years of grass-roots work as an activist and
organizer. Gül is from Kayseri, a Central
Anatolian city closely integrated with global
markets. Born in 1950, he received a PhD from an
Istanbul university in 1983, and studied in
England. He was an economist at the Islamic
Development Bank until 1991, when he became a
full-time politician. Arinç, a lawyer, was born
in 1948 in Bursa, a conservative city in the
industrial Marmara region, and has been
politically active since his youth. Arinç still
retains links with his old Islamist party, while
Gül serves as a bridge between the Islamists and
international business, Turkey?s ruling elite and
the liberal intelligentsia. This new generation
of political entrepreneurs was far more receptive to cooperation with the West.
Thus a new alignment emerged from the seeming
impasse of 1997. It had become clear that the
ideological and class differences among the
Islamists were too sharp to be contained within a
single party. There were insoluble tensions
between the liberalizing business wing and the
more conservative and working-class sectors. The
authoritarian structure of the party did not
allow aspiring young activists to have a say in
decision-making. In 2001 the rebels established
their own organization, the Justice and
Development Party (akp), having failed to take
over the existing structures at a major party
congress. Erdog(an and the other akp leaders
moved quickly to reassure the military and media
establishments that religion would not be used
for political purposes and that the akp would not
challenge the headscarf ban. They were also
vociferously pro-European. They made frequent
trips to the United States, holding meetings
whose agendas have remained private. Gül
helpfully explained to an American audience that
the akp were ?the wasps of Turkey?. It was clear
that the new leadership was trying to reclaim the
territory of the centre-right in Turkish
politics?in effect, to reconstitute an updated
version of that alliance of provincial
businessmen, religious intellectuals and state
elite at which the subordinate fraction of the
ruling power bloc had traditionally aimed, but
which had become impossible with the rise of a
radical Islamism. Now, this alliance could also
offer to strengthen the hand of the neo-liberal
and export-oriented sectors of Turkish capital.
Large numbers of centre-right politicians,
intellectuals and supporters soon swelled its ranks.
full: http://newleftreview.org/?page=article&view=2657
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] I stand corrected and an explanation,
Nestor Gorojovsky Sun 22 Apr 2007, 23:34 GMT
- [Marxism] Green Left - Zimbabwean socialist: ‘A new movement is emerging',
glparramatta Sun 22 Apr 2007, 23:21 GMT
- [Marxism] Death toll mount as US proxy war against Somaiian insurgents heats up,
Fred Feldman Sun 22 Apr 2007, 21:13 GMT
- [Marxism] Kahentinetha Horn: The Onkwehonwe Democratic Agenda,
Fred Feldman Sun 22 Apr 2007, 21:00 GMT
- [Marxism] How Turkey's Islamic party serves US imperialism,
Louis Proyect Sun 22 Apr 2007, 19:45 GMT
- [Marxism] General Motors collaboration with Adolph Hitler,
Louis Proyect Sun 22 Apr 2007, 18:54 GMT
- [Marxism] Alex Cockburn on how to prevent future Virginia Techs,
Louis Proyect Sun 22 Apr 2007, 18:35 GMT
- [Marxism] Infant death rate on rise in US South, especially among Blacks,
Fred Feldman Sun 22 Apr 2007, 18:33 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]