Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Whimsical Terry Eagleton interview
NY Times Magazine, April 22, 2007
Questions for Terry Eagleton
The Believer
Interview By DEBORAH SOLOMON
Q: As a professor of cultural theory at the
University of Manchester in England, you reach
some surprisingly sentimental conclusions in your
new book, ?The Meaning of Life.? Tell us, What
does life mean? Perhaps the two strongest
candidates for the answer to the question are
happiness and love. But one of the terrible
things about the word ?happiness? is that it is
so utterly feeble. It evokes the idea of people
cavorting around with manic grins on their faces.
Is there a word you prefer to ?happiness??
Aristotle, of course, uses a term which is better
translated as ?well-being.? The term I like is ?fulfillment.?
And where do you advise us to look for
fulfillment? There?s a famous phrase from Karl
Marx, in which he says that he wants a society in
which the full development of each is the
condition of the full development of all. What
would it be like to find our fulfillment through
each other rather than against each other?
In the book, you define love in egalitarian terms
as well. But that doesn?t ring very true. What if
someone falls in love with, for instance, a voice
heard on the phone? You can talk about having
affection or love for all kinds of things. You
can love your handbag or bedroom slippers. That
isn?t the full model of love, where each realizes
himself or herself through the other doing the same.
Does love for a pet dog constitute true love, by
your definition? No. Because it?s a biologically
different species, it doesn?t realize itself,
doesn?t flower into its own being, through that.
Do you find that having children adds meaning to
life? I find that for a left-winger like me, the
problem is that either your children out-left you or they become fascists.
Unlike most left-wingers, you have been a
champion of religion. I did attack Richard
Dawkins?s book on God because I think he is
theologically illiterate. I value my Catholic
background very much. It taught me not to be
afraid of rigorous thought, for one thing.
Where do you think all these neo-atheists like
Dawkins are coming from? I suppose it is a
reaction to various ugly types of fundamentalism.
I?m entirely with Dawkins in condemning redneck
fascists from Texas to the Taliban. But the
trouble with Dawkins is that he thinks that?s what religion is.
You are generally described as England?s
best-known literary critic. Where does that leave
Clive James, whose essay collection, ?Cultural
Amnesia,? was just published amid great fanfare
in New York? I don?t really think he is a
literary critic, although he is very clever.
Do you disapprove of the way he treats high
culture and pop culture with equal seriousness?
Not at all. My chair is in cultural studies. But
that?s not the same as running off on chat shows.
What?s interesting is that neither you nor he
seems to write much about actual books. I think
what?s happened is that the literary critic has
turned increasingly into a cultural critic
because there are so many crises in our culture.
Have you read anything good lately? I don?t
actually read other peoples? books. If I want to
read a book, I write one myself. I have written more than 40 books.
How scandalous. Someone should stop you. I have
tried to stop writing. In fact, I am looking for
a ?contrascriptive? ? a tablet you can take that
stops you from writing. There?s this organization
called Writers Anonymous. They try to get you
down from a full-length volume to a poem.
Very funny. Do you plan to go on book tour in the
U.S.? No. As I get older, I find my visits to the
States get shorter because I can?t take the
general culture very much. I know I am back in
the States because at the hotel breakfasts they are all talking about money.
Prince Charles once called you ?that dreadful
Terry Eagleton.? What about you is so offensive
to him? I think just existing is probably enough.
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] Infant death rate on rise in US South, especially among Blacks, (continued)
- [Marxism] Nandigram Massacre: Film by NAHANYATE,
Sukla Sen Sun 22 Apr 2007, 17:01 GMT
- [Marxism] Putin and "re-secretization",
Louis Proyect Sun 22 Apr 2007, 14:15 GMT
- [Marxism] The economics behind the obesity epidemic,
Louis Proyect Sun 22 Apr 2007, 13:16 GMT
- [Marxism] Whimsical Terry Eagleton interview,
Louis Proyect Sun 22 Apr 2007, 13:15 GMT
- [Marxism] Fidel Castro resumes official business,
Louis Proyect Sun 22 Apr 2007, 12:59 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]