Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] ForLiberation Newsletter
> Debate: the need to believe
>
> By Jacques Bouveresse
>
> Rationalists seem to believe that religion should be replaceable by
> something other than a religion. Their proposition has been
> countered by the argument of obligatory, indeed, automatic
> replacement, according to which anything that destroys religion, if
> it is not itself already a religion, is doomed to become one anyway.
> http://www.forliberation.org/site/archive/issue0407/article010407.htm
This is a citation of an interesting article, and I recommend that
people give it a look. However, it is in serious need of criticism
from a progressive viewpoint that goes beyond the world of thought to
engage the real world.
It stuck me as being very superficial in that it did not really
explore the source of our need to believe. I don't wish to initiate a
long and tedious discussion, but let me instead simply offer a
proposition to illustrate what I mean.
1. Humans must have the sense of an alternative future and of their
capacity to achieve it. This is the basis of our sense of freedom
and power over circumstance; it is the source of joy in life; it is
what makes us human.
2. Religion offers an ideal alternative to what exists, and while that
may offer direction in life and some personal satisfaction, even
joy, it does not bring with it any significant capacity to actually
change things. As an essentially static joy that represents a state
of mind independent of circumstance, it is an empty joy such as
might be provided by an intoxicant.
3. Any alternative to religion must a) represent a transcendence of
circumstance, not just in thought, but in terms of real
possibilities, and b) it also must point to a transcendence by our
social being (individual and society as aspects of one process),
rather than just as individuals.
4. Marxism offers a way of seeing things in terms of contradiction. A
contradiction represents both the potentials for transcending what
exists and the need for doing so, and our consciousness arises from
this contradictory reality rather than being external to it. To
represent the world in thought as consisting of contradictions
offers an alternative to religion, and to base one's actions on the
emergence of objective contradictions offers the possibility for
material change that religion lacks to any significant degree.
Haines Brown
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] Me, bear proof?, (continued)
- [Marxism] GuantÃnamo Detainees Stage Hunger Strike (NYT),
Walter Lippmann Mon 09 Apr 2007, 11:50 GMT
- [Marxism] Failed Strike Shows up ZCTU Shortcomings,
Greg McDonald Mon 09 Apr 2007, 11:45 GMT
- [Marxism] ForLiberation Newsletter,
forliberation@xxxxxxxxx Mon 09 Apr 2007, 09:26 GMT
- [Marxism] Imperialist intervention and the Hungarian uprising?,
Sayan Bhattacharyya Mon 09 Apr 2007, 07:10 GMT
- [Marxism] SAARC: Iran Gains Observer Status: Open Snub to Bush Administration,
Sukla Sen Mon 09 Apr 2007, 07:01 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]