[Marxism] Morales: Following Chavez or own path?

["Walter Lippmann" <walterlx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Morales: Following Chavez or own path?
By DAN KEANE
Associated Press Writer

Caption:
A woman walks beneath a government billboard in the city of El Alto
featuring the faces of Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, left, and Cuba's Fidel
Castro, center, alongside Bolivia's President Evo Morales, Wednesday, April
4, 2007. Morales this week announced plans to nationalize Bolivia's largest
telecommunications company, only months after Chavez did the same in
Venezuela.
Juan Karita / AP Photo

See the poster described in this caption above
http://www.miamiherald.com/915/story/65430.html#x 

LA PAZ, Bolivia --
Rewrite the constitution: check. Redistribute idle land: check. Rail against
U.S. imperialism: check. Nationalize the phone company: check.

The populist agendas of President Evo Morales and his Venezuelan ally Hugo
Chavez are strikingly similar, a fact highlighted this week when Morales
announced plans to nationalize Bolivia's largest telecommunications company
only months after Chavez did the same with Venezuela's.

The parallels alarm critics who see Morales following Chavez into an
ill-defined socialist future.

Yet most of the reforms championed by Morales, Bolivia's first Indian
president, spring from Bolivia's own turbulent history. And while its
policies are similar, Bolivia - poor, largely indigenous, and landlocked -
may see far different results than oil-rich Venezuela.

Morales does not deny Chavez's influence. He flies around Bolivia in
military helicopters on loan from the Venezuelan president and implemented
last year's gas nationalization with the same U.S. lawyers Chavez uses for
his own government takeovers - with Chavez footing the bill.

Like Chavez, he cites President Fidel Castro of Cuba as a hero. "Comrade
Hugo Chavez, son of Comrade Fidel - they are the two commanders of the
liberating forces of America," he said while welcoming Chavez to Bolivia
last month.

But to suggest Chavez is the engine of change in Bolivia would be a mistake.

The revolution Morales leads was sparked by violent protests in 2000 against
U.S.-based Bechtel Corp. for raising rates after taking over the public
water utility in Cochabamba, unleashing a deep frustration with Bolivia's
failed privatization experiments of the 1990s.

"The idea is homegrown," said Jim Shultz, director of the Democracy Center,
a Cochabamba-based nonprofit monitoring Bolivian politics. "Whether or not
it's being pushed farther or in more directions because Morales is following
the model of Venezuela is known only to the backroom conversations between
Evo and Hugo."

Morales' first 14 months in office read like a condensed version of Chavez's
eight years in power.

Like the Venezuelan leader, Morales has convened an assembly to rewrite the
constitution, pushed to expand his executive powers, triggered an ambitious
land reform and consolidated state control over key natural resources and
industries.

Ecuador could follow a similar path under new President Rafael Correa. After
his December election, Correa announced an April 15 vote for a constituent
assembly that will rewrite that country's constitution.

But in Bolivia, groups backed by the indigenous majority were demanding a
new constitution well before Chavez's 1998 election. Their years-old
graffiti is still visible on walls in La Paz.

Morales' land reform bill, passed in November to expropriate idle and
fraudulently obtained tracts for the landless poor, seeks to revive a failed
1952 land reform.

And demands to nationalize Bolivia's natural gas were the battle cry in
street protests that ousted two recent presidents.

By contrast, there has been no native groundswell of support for Morales'
plan to re-nationalize former state telecom company Entel, which would
reverse what is widely considered the only success story in Bolivia's
privatization frenzy a decade ago.

In a decade of rapid technological change, Entel's foreign owner Telecom
Italia poured more than $600 million into the company, building Bolivia's
largest cellular and Internet networks nearly from scratch.

Morales, however, lacks the fistfuls of petrodollars Chavez can throw at his
own takeover of former state telecom company C.A. Nacional Telefonos de
Venezuela, or CANTV, announced in January.

Chavez also has political control that has eluded Morales.

Venezuela's National Assembly just gave him free rein to rule by decree for
18 months while Morales constantly locks horns with an opposition-controlled
Senate and powerful state governors - foes who often portray him as a
follower of Chavez.

"He is converting himself into an echo, into an actor copying the decisions
of President Chavez," said Jose Antonio Aruquipa, spokesman for the
opposition party Podemos.

"Chavez attacks the press; Morales does it too. Chavez moves against the
right of private property, and here they announce similar measures."

The spread of "Chavismo" can be seen as reversal of the 1990s, when Latin
American countries lined up behind a U.S.-backed privatization push that
ultimately failed to benefit the region's poor majority.

But Bolivia's notoriously impatient electorate - the five years before Evo
won office saw five different presidents - will have final say on Morales'
homespun revolution.

And Bolivians of all political stripes tend to squirm when Morales calls
Chavez "comandante."

"Cuba and Castro never could establish a presence here, even with Che
(Guevara)," said political analyst Mario Espinoza, referring to the Cuban
revolutionary killed in 1967 while trying to spark a communist uprising in
Bolivia. "Venezuela is now in fashion, but it's only a fashion."


________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism