Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Lebowitz on Chavez's enabling law "Why Aren't You in a Hurry, Comrade?"
- To: marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Marxism] Lebowitz on Chavez's enabling law "Why Aren't You in a Hurry, Comrade?"
- From: Andrew Pollack <acpollack2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 06:43:17 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=l0vT0p/eAvL9ECfwYiFm2NvEjuaBjHBFXzCSXTIykCCV4T7GeQ/uR59/23cwvXKuXoUuybCLXWqGEaLy/nkDTyEScmaKsyfMA0YgxYuZ1AdVDiIlL2tBrpMyKKbkDtU/Zy3JzCN7buRlagLGWFXGEfUculZip21arESC4jEB3to= ;
I like Michael's article but would just add a couple points that he may want to
include or address in future versions.
1. I think it would help to find parallels in the US regarding what the
Executive branch can do by issuance of regulations, rules, etc. While every
President abuses this on behalf of business, 99% of this regulation issuance
is just the normal, efficient way of doing business under a bourgeois
government. I suspect some of Chavez' new powers would not go beyond those
bounds, but we should find specific parallels. Of course under a genuine
soviet government, in which the executive is a creature of the legislature,
this wouldn't be nearly as much of an issue.
2. Michael's quotes from activists in the communal councils are the key to
the whole dispute, especially their desire to get around the bureaucrats --
i.e., the state officials -- who have been stonewalling the revolution. What
this does not address, however, is why the new parliament couldn't just
approve the same regulations. We need to hear more on that. More
fundamentally, if the councils take root in every workplace and neighborhood,
and gather into a national body, then, as I mentioned above, the executive's
regulation issuance would be at the behest of that soviet-style body. In the
absence of that one can understand the activists' impatience.
I remember, by the way, hearing a TV report in 1979 about how the new
Sandinista government was postponing elections to the National Assembly and
having a knee-jerk reaction assuming there was something undemocratic about it
(later, of course, they convened (for a short while) a parliament MORE
democratic in the sense that it represented social sectors as such). As
embarrassing as this admission is, it speaks to how easily even we lefties can
be fooled by the bourgeois media.
Andy
---------------------------------
Have a burning question? Go to Yahoo! Answers and get answers from real people
who know.
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] Chinese Govt. Attacks Marxist Internet Archives, (continued)
- [Marxism] Re: Chinese Govt. Attacks Marxist Internet,
hari.kumar Thu 01 Feb 2007, 23:49 GMT
- [Marxism] Lebowitz on Chavez's enabling law "Why Aren't You in a Hurry, Comrade?",
Fred Fuentes Thu 01 Feb 2007, 22:05 GMT
- [Marxism] Phil Perrier funeral announcement,
Louis Proyect Thu 01 Feb 2007, 20:26 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Fw: Chinese Govt. Attacks Marxist Internet Archives,,
Saul Thomas Thu 01 Feb 2007, 19:50 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]