Re: [Marxism] Re:Antiwar protests

["aaron amaral" <amaral1871@xxxxxxxxx>]

I am not sure it is an issue of a conspiracy to low-ball the numbers.
But where they get there info from....In any event,  100,000 was the
consensus among the many activist I spoke to while I was down there.
-aa

On 1/31/07, Sayan Bhattacharyya <ok.president+marxmail@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 1/31/07, Alexandra Fuller <alexandrafuller1980@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On the weekend's big DC march, I was thinking that the numbers given by
> > the
> > UFPJ numbers seemed too large, while the press was seriously lowballing it
> > with that "tens of thousands" hooey.
>
>
>
> Just out of curiosity, what interest do people think the press (especially
> the liberal press) has in lowballing the numbers?
> ________________________________________________
> YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
> Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism