Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] To the Right of the Right
- To: marxmail <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Marxism] To the Right of the Right
- From: Walter Lippmann <walterlx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:03:06 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=T2UB95RBwBB/fJ3+hLPbCMe5X2Bdw7HEEMZGJ+eUXTeA0AeXekcDxMrXZuO2w/mS; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
(There's no softness on holocaust-denial in Cuba.)
======================================================
JUVENTUD REBELDE
To the Right of the Right
Neo-fascist MPs have formed their own groups in Europe â such are the
paradoxes
of the âdemocracyâ
By: Luis Luque Alvarez
Email: luque@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2007-01-17 | 11:22:48 EST
http://www.juventudrebelde.co.cu/international/2007-01-17/to-the-right-of-the-right-/
A Brahim Bouraam, an Arab immigrant, was thrown into the Seine in Paris amidst a
chorus of mockery. Ibrahim Ali, a fellow Arab from the Comoros Islands, was shot
to death, pumped full of bullets. In both cases, the misdeeds were carried out
by
members of the neo-fascist National Front.
To the northeast, in Belgium, while a politician from the Vlaams Belang (Flemish
Interest) speaks bitterly of immigration from the South, a young skinhead named
Erick hurries to remove a Celtic cross, like the ones worn by the neo-Nazis.
When
asked by a journalist from Spanish newspaper El Pais, Erick answers, âNo,
weâre
not Nazis; we just want the best for our people, the Flemish â without
immigrants.â
It is all about nostalgia for the swastika, the cross of Hitlerâs regime. If
the
Fuhrerâs grudge was against the Jews, the neo-Nazisâ are against
immigrants, gypsies,
Turks, and... âothers.â Curiously enough, democracy is so âadvancedâ
that these
groups are represented in their national parliaments. And, moreover, they are a
political bloc in the European Parliament!
This became news last week. Far-rightwing MPs in parliament have a sufficient
quorum
to create a separate caucus with its own identity. On January 9, Tuesday,
âultra-right
representativesâ signed their charter of principles and sent it to Parliament
President
Josep Borrell. The documentâs character, according to reports, has been
described
as âbroadly anti-immigrant, opposed to the European Constitution and is
against
Turkey joining the UE.â
On January 15, the group was officially recognized during a plenary session with
the name âIdentity, Tradition and Sovereignty,â and will have the right to
receive
funding from the UE just like any of the others bloc in the parliament, such as
the Socialists, Greens, etc.
But here is a bit of information and irony: to create this political group in
the
European Parliament, there must be at least twenty representatives from six
different
countries. On January 1, with the membership of Rumania and Bulgaria, this
condition
was met. This occurred despite a vote against the expansion by the Austrian
ultra-right
organization Freedom Party of Austria (FPO).
Who are the new members of the ensemble? Heading the list is the French National
Front, with seven representatives; in second place comes the Great Rumania
Party,
with five; there are three from the Belgiumâs Vlaams Belang, two from
Italyâs Social
Action and Tricolour Flame, one from FPO, and one British independent.
But names are just names; they can be beautiful and say nothing. To get a better
sense of these elements, we will have to know the members of the new tribe.
A PHOTO WITH ADOLF
âI didnât say the gas chambers never existed, although I havenât seen
them personally,
nor have I studied the question in particular. However, I think they are only a
detail of the history of the Second World War.â
Gas chambers are a simple âdetailâ to the head of the National Front,
French European
representative Jean Marie Le Pen, one of the heads of the new group. This lord
of
the right, who has gone so far to say that the Nazi occupation of France âwas
not
especially inhuman,â has been taken to court more than once. He was even
expelled
from the European parliament in 2003 for physically attacking a political
opponent.
Some of Le Penâs other âgemsâ has been to criticise the French football
team for
having âtoo many blacks,â becoming upset when they sang the La
Marseillaise, and
to say that when AIDS patients âbreath air through their pores, they alter
the equilibrium
of the nation;â this of course is the same way that Hitler sensed handicapped
people
to be a source of danger!
It freezes ones blood to think that this individual obtained the votes needed to
run for office against Jacques Chirac in 2002. Fortunately, the motto âVote
for
the thief, not the fascistâ mobilized the electorate and the dinosaur was
defeated
in the second round.
Anther of the âneoconsâ of the National Front is Bruno Gollnisch, who is
supposed
to head the caucus. An interesting piece of information is that he is still
awaiting
a court verdict on his expressing ideas similar to those of Le Penâs. In
October
2004 he opened his mouth to say, âI donât question the existence of
concentration
camps, but historians can debate about the number of deaths. As for the
existence
of gas chambers, it is up to the historians to reach an agreement on the
number.â
Is there any doubt about the quality of this guy?
Moving north on the map, we find the Belgian organization Vlaams Belang, which
is
frantically anti-immigrant and supports dividing the country, declaring the
independence
of Flanders (the Dutch speaking northern part of Belgium) to the detriment of
French-speaking
Wallonia.
This political organization, which has requested total amnesty for those who
collaborated
with the Nazi regime, was born out of the ashes of Vlaams Blok, an organization
condemned by a court in 2004 for âinciting hatred and discrimination.â Its
members
then dissolved the organization to set up Vlaams Belang, a rearrangement
described
by the Belgian security services as a âcosmetic operation.â
One of its MPs, Koenraad Dillen, was at the center of a scandal in 1995, when it
was learned that in 1992 he had visited Leon Degrelle, a fascist who
collaborated
with the Waffen-SS during the Second World War. If this was not enough, Dillen
had
in his living room a photo signed by Degrelle in which he appears sporting a
uniform
of the SS while being congratulated by Hitler himself. Is this something about
which
this democrat is proud!
And among the most colorful figures of this troop is the distinguished
Alessandra
Mussolini, granddaughter of you know who. The last name, in this case, is not
the
problem, but her track record: Alessandra, an ex-porno star and cover-girl on
two
Playboy editions (in 1983, in 2003), founded her own party âSocial Actionâ
after
abandoning the ultra-right National Alliance. She left because one of its
members,
the then Minister of Foreign Affairs Gianfranco Fini, supposedly said
âfascism was
an absolute evil.â
That sounded like an insult to the granddaughter of Il Duce, so she broke with
them.
Nonetheless, she is a âlegitimateâ representative in the European
Parliament, where
she is part of the Justice and Social Liberties Committee. In addition to this
she
is an honor member of the Italian Red Cross.
She is almost an angel, no?
NEITHER GYPSIES, TURKS OR ANYONE ELSE
The war chest of the recalcitrants has now been enriched with the emergence of
the
Rumanian and Bulgarian ultra-right representatives. In the case of the
Rumanians,
their five representatives belong to Great Rumania, a party which is
characterized
by its extremist nationalism, its deep hatred against gypsy and Hungarian
minorities,
and its unconcealed desire to annex the neighboring Republic of Moldova â an
ex-Soviet
territory which is currently an independent state.
Their leader, Corneliu Vadim Tudor, as early as 2003 said he would not fight
against
the Jewish people and that he had become a philo-Semite. Likewise, he said he
was
âwrong for having denied the holocaust in Rumania, which took place from 1941
to
1944 under the regime of (Ion) Antonescu.â The dictator has killed between
280,000
and 380,000 Jews and more than 10,000 Gypsies. And it was just yesterday, as
people
say, that Tudor figured it out!
A short time later, an ex-advisor denied his strange âconversion.â
Finally, there is the Bulgarian legislator Dimitar Stoyanov, who the president
of
the community legislature wanted thrown out. What was the motive? Learning about
the possibility of electing the Hungarian Gypsy Livia Jaroka as a
parliamentarian
in 2006, he circulated an e-mail that read: âIn my country there are
thousands of
Gypsy girls more beautiful than this honorable woman. In fact, if you are at the
right time and place, you can even buy one âa 12 or 13 year-oldâ to be your
beloved
wife.â
The elegant Euro deputy is proud of children prostitution in his country, and
also
utters his racist tones against the gypsies. This is not a surprise since the
leader
of his Ataka party, Volen Siderov, has repeatedly accused all the people
belonging
to this ethnic group of putting âgypsy fearâ into practice against
Bulgarians, under
the supposedly conspiratorial eye of the state.
The racist implications are very rampant in those preaching. And the young
Stoyanov
will have the opportunity to repeat them frequently in the halls of Strasbourg.
If you look at the web site of the European Parliament you will see that, among
the requirements to be elected deputy is being of legal age and âbe a citizen
of
a member state and to meet the requirements of residence defined by the
electoral
law of the state.â
However, there is no section specifying that those who support xenophobic
practices,
incite discrimination against minorities, and admire or minimize Nazi crimes,
are
not allowed to enter the EU.
It seems that this matter is left to the consideration of national laws. Because
of this we are witnessing the great paradox of this bloc within the community.
While
the UE professes to âguarantee that its citizens can live in peace, liberty
and
prosperity,â it also allows into decision-making positions supporters of the
most
notorious criminals in history and agitators of violence against minorities.
Is this positive for Europe? Is it an example of its âtoleranceâ and its
ârespect
for diversity?â
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] Virtual warfare kicks fascists out of the island of Porcupine, (continued)
- [Marxism] Two more articles on crisis in Bolivia,
Fred Fuentes Thu 18 Jan 2007, 08:20 GMT
- [Marxism] Leninism,
Roberto Jorquera Thu 18 Jan 2007, 08:17 GMT
- [Marxism] al-Hakim, main Maliki ally, criticizes US detention of Iranians as violation of Iraq's sovereignty,
Fred Feldman Thu 18 Jan 2007, 04:27 GMT
- [Marxism] To the Right of the Right,
Walter Lippmann Thu 18 Jan 2007, 03:01 GMT
- [Marxism] Labor Party meeting,
Charles Brown Wed 17 Jan 2007, 22:01 GMT
- [Marxism] More on Marx and the environment,
Ernest Tate Wed 17 Jan 2007, 21:38 GMT
- [Marxism] NOTICE: MIA under attack. SAVE-OUR-SITE!,
dwalters Wed 17 Jan 2007, 21:27 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]