Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] offlist
- To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Marxism] offlist
- From: Walter Lippmann <walterlx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 09:28:36 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=sHAM45xhsjsVUMwYEHGTTlYVS1KGgvf6RLbxrBIwq2/mvcfoFBLB+bjtTGTk6z/F; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
well, at least you and I can have a civilized discussion,
and we can provide a good model for anyone else who
would like to do something similar.
Chao,
-----Original Message-----
>From: Marvin Gandall <marvgandall@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Oct 15, 2006 9:25 AM
>To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [Marxism] Learning about China from media accounts
>
>Walter wrote:
>
>> Similarly, Anita Chan's most interesting report on China's trade unions
>> contains this significant element, also not the kind we normally read
>> on Marxmail, but a hopeful sign nevertheless:
>
>> http://www.japanfocus.org/products/topdf/2217
>> ..The ACFTU?s confrontation with Wal-Mart has opened up a means for
>> reformers to
>> operate in future, and has set a precedent for Chinese workers to
>> take on their employers and to demand union branches. ..Under China?s
>> labor law and the
>> present political situation, they may find this politically feasible
>> and more productive than fighting to set up autonomous trade unions
>> as advocated by China Labor Bulletin and some Western trade unions
>> that call on China to permit autonomous trade unions.
>===================================
>This is why the unionization of the Walmart stores could be potentially
>significant for Chinese and US workers, and not to be dismissed out of hand.
>But there is only the official shell of a union there now, and the Chinese
>leadership will be very careful about losing foreign investment and creating
>precedents for workers in Chinese-owned enterprises. This should become more
>clear, however, when details are made known about the powers which the union
>will have at Walmart.
>
>Louis has already commented on Will Hutton's Guardian reference to to
>one-party rule and the lack of democratic political rights as not being
>indicative that the mode of production is not capitalist. The Chinese
>leadership was very influenced when it embarked on its reforms by the "Asian
>Tiger" model of development in South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, and Malaysia,
>all of whom relied on authoritarian one-party states to maintain stability
>and facilitate the consolidation and financing of large private or
>jointly-owned firms capable of competing in world markets.
>
>
>
>
>
>________________________________________________
>YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
>Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] Michael Yates on teaching economics,
Louis Proyect Sun 15 Oct 2006, 21:24 GMT
- [Marxism] Stone and Miller,
Andrew Pollack Sun 15 Oct 2006, 17:33 GMT
- [Marxism] offlist,
Walter Lippmann Sun 15 Oct 2006, 16:28 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Marxmailistas, "No, No, No" and the politics of why can't we all just get along.,
Walter Lippmann Sun 15 Oct 2006, 16:26 GMT
- [Marxism] Post on N. Korea: it's the US's fault,
Andrew Pollack Sun 15 Oct 2006, 15:48 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]