Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] Marxism and Conspiracy
- To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Marxism] Marxism and Conspiracy
- From: David Thorstad <binesi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 18:36:30 -0500
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
Mr./Comrade Austin:
My advice to you is to chill and reflect before you speak.
You must be very young indeed not to realize how wrong your
assumptions about the Vietnam War and the "lies that were used to lead
the US" into it are. Ditto the Tonkin Gulf charade, a Democrat scam no
different from anything the Bushgang has cooked up (and which, true to
form as the historic party of war, the Democrats have endorsed from the
gitgo). All kinds of us, even young students like myself at the time,
saw through this phony justification for bombing the shit out of North
Vietnam. You are not even comparing apples and oranges. Assuming you are
too young to have lived through the Vietnam period, have you ever
researched it before jumping to conclusions? The same goes for your
many posts on 9/11.
I mean these comments in a fraternal spirit. Try perhaps to shed
light rather than merely spouting off?
David
Austin, Andrew wrote:
How many people do you think knew about the lies that were used to lead
the US into the Vietnam War? How long did those lies remain hidden.
Would it have been a reasonable argument then to claim that it would be
impossible for so many people to keep hidden something like a conspiracy
that led a country into a war in which more than 50,000 US soldiers and
millions of civilians were killed? Sure, the truth came out. But how
long did it take? The government only this year admitted what some of
us came to believe, namely that they lied about the Gulf of Tonkin. Not
that the Gulf of Tonkin was on the scale of 9-11, but the point remains
that it is logically fallacious to argue that something must not be true
because nobody whose word you would trust and wouldn't malign as crazy
has come forward to say it's not true. As long as we're speculating,
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] Marxism and Conspiracy, (continued)
- Re: [Marxism] Marxism and Conspiracy,
Intense Red Sat 09 Sep 2006, 22:10 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Marxism and Conspiracy,
Louis Proyect Sat 09 Sep 2006, 22:29 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Marxism and Conspiracy,
Carrol Cox Sat 09 Sep 2006, 22:40 GMT
- RE: [Marxism] Marxism and Conspiracy,
Austin, Andrew Sat 09 Sep 2006, 23:11 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Marxism and Conspiracy,
David Thorstad Sat 09 Sep 2006, 23:36 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Marxism and Conspiracy,
Carrol Cox Sun 10 Sep 2006, 00:00 GMT
- RE: [Marxism] Marxism and Conspiracy,
Austin, Andrew Sun 10 Sep 2006, 00:04 GMT
- RE: [Marxism] Marxism and Conspiracy,
Austin, Andrew Sun 10 Sep 2006, 00:02 GMT
Re: [Marxism] Marxism and Conspiracy,
Tony Lawless Sat 09 Sep 2006, 02:52 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]