Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] More from Cockburn
The Counterpunch website has an expanded version
of the piece I posted the other day. It gets into
the Pearl Harbor question. Maybe Alex read Jacob Levich's post!
Cockburn:
Naturally, there are conspiracies. I think there
is strong evidence that FDR did have knowledge
that a Japanese naval force in the north Pacific
was going to launch an attack on Pearl Harbor.
Roosevelt thought it would be a relatively mild
assault and thought it would be the final green
light to get the US into the war.
Of course it?s very probable that the FBI or US
military intelligence, even the CIA, had
penetrated the Al Qaeda team planning the 9/11
attacks; that intelligence reports ? some are
already known ? piled up in various Washington
bureaucracies pointing to the impending onslaught
and even the manner in which it might be carried out.
The history of intelligence operations is profuse
with example of successful intelligence
collection, but also fatal slowness to act on the
intelligence, along with eagnerness not to
compromise the security and future usefulness of
the informant, who has to prove his own
credentials by even pressing for prompt action by
the plotters. Sometime an undercover agent will
actually propose an action, either to deflect
efforts away from some graver threat, or to put
the plotters in a position where they can be
caught red-handed. In their penetrations of
environmental groups the FBI certainly did this.
Long before the Yom Kippur war, a CIA analyst
noted Egyptian orders from a German engineering
firm, and deduced from the type and size of
equipment thus ordered that Egypt was planning an
attack across the Suez canal. He worked out the
probable size of the Egyptian force and the
likely time window for the attack. His superiors
at the CIA sat on the report. When the Egyptian
army finally attacked on October 6, 1973 the CIA
high command ordered up the long-buried report,
dusted it off and sent it over to the White
House, marked ?current intelligence?. Was there a
?conspiracy? by the CIA high command to allow
Israel to be taken by surprise? I doubt it.
Bureaucratic inertia and caution prevailed, until
the moment came for decisive CYA acitvity. The
nuts make dizzying ?deductive? leaps. There is a
one particularly vigorous coven which has
established to its own satisfaction that the
original NASA moon landing was faked, and never
took place. This ?conspiracy? would have required
the complicity of thousands of people , all of
whom have kept their mouths shut. The proponents
of the ?fake moon landing? plot tend to overlap with the JFK and 9/11 nuts.
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] Brazil s Lula still ahead in Polls,
Carlos Petroni Sat 09 Sep 2006, 22:26 GMT
- [Marxism] bipartisan 9/11 propaganda (was conspiracy theory),
Andrew Pollack Sat 09 Sep 2006, 21:03 GMT
- [Marxism] Re: Brazil s Lula still ahead in Polls,
Carlos Eduardo Rebello Sat 09 Sep 2006, 21:01 GMT
- [Marxism] FW: 4 Iraq Vets Detained at Pentagon,
Louis Proyect Sat 09 Sep 2006, 20:10 GMT
- [Marxism] More from Cockburn,
Louis Proyect Sat 09 Sep 2006, 20:06 GMT
- [Marxism] think before you post?,
David Thorstad Sat 09 Sep 2006, 18:13 GMT
- [Marxism] Decent Militant editorial on Iran,
Fred Feldman Sat 09 Sep 2006, 16:04 GMT
- [Marxism] [Revised] NYTimes.com: In Brazil, Former Ally May Spoil Race,
Carlos Eduardo Rebello Sat 09 Sep 2006, 15:59 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]