Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Indian tribes fight for exemption from federal labor law
I grew up the child of a doctor at Patton State Hospital which is
next to the San Manuel Indian Reservation and hiked in the
reservation hills as a lad. On at least one occasion when I tried to
go on the reservation to see a boy that I knew slightly, I was
excluded, among other reasons, probably because of the poverty that
outsiders would have seen.
Brian Shannon
==========
Indian tribes fight for exemption from federal labor law
ERICA WERNER
Associated Press
SAN MANUEL INDIAN RESERVATION, Calif. - Once steeped in poverty, the
San Manuel Band of Mission Indians has become one of the nation's
wealthiest tribes thanks to casino gambling.
Now the Southern California tribe is using its riches to fund a
potentially precedent-setting legal fight contending that tribes are
exempt from federal labor laws because they are sovereign governments.
A ruling against San Manuel could open the door for unions to
organize an estimated 250,000 workers - dealers, servers, cooks - at
the nation's 400-plus tribal casinos. Except for a handful in
California, tribal casinos are generally not unionized; unions say
it's difficult to make inroads without the protection of federal
organizing rules.
"It's tremendously significant because tribal gaming is a target for
labor, one of the significant targets for labor, and this would
significantly open up the ability of labor to organize," said Joseph
A. Turzi, an attorney who has represented tribes in labor disputes
but isn't involved in this case.
Backed by many of the country's leading tribal organizations, San
Manuel is fighting a 2004 opinion by the National Labor Relations
Board that asserted the board's jurisdiction over tribal businesses.
Under the decision, tribes would be covered for the first time by the
National Labor Relations Act that bars unfair labor practices and
gives workers the rights to organize and bargain with employers.
"They've taken the tribe and simply defined us as an employer instead
of a government, which we are," said San Manuel Vice Chairman Vincent
Duro. "That is, to me, really outrageous. The erosion in and of
tribal sovereignty is a serious threat."
The case is before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit, where oral arguments are expected in coming months.
Both sides believe the matter could end up before the U.S. Supreme
Court.
"It's that kind of a case," said David Fleischer, senior attorney
with the labor board, which has been joined in the case by the state
of Connecticut and the Unite Here hotel and restaurant union, based
in New York.
Once little more than brush-covered hills and palm trees 60 miles
east of Los Angeles, the 800-acre San Manuel reservation now has
attractive new office buildings and freshly landscaped homes.
A booming $300 million casino, featuring 2,000 slot machines, opened
last year and employs more than 2,500 people. The 180-member tribe
could add 5,500 more slots under a deal just approved by Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger that's awaiting approval by California lawmakers.
San Manuel officials said the tribe's success shows Indian gambling
is improving economic conditions for Indians - just as Congress
intended.
The National Labor Relations Board argues that casino-owning tribes
have started behaving more like traditional businesses than sovereign
governments, and should be treated as such.
"Running a commercial business is not an expression of sovereignty in
the same way that running a tribal court system is," the labor board
said in its opinion, approved by a 3-1 vote.
The litigation stems from a 1998 complaint filed with the labor board
by Unite Here, then known as Here, that accused San Manuel of denying
the union an opportunity to organize while allowing access by another
union, the Communications Workers of America, which now has a
contract to represent most workers at the casino.
. . .
FULL AT
<http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/
15433512.htm>
OR http://makeashorterlink.com/?S1EB520BD
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] Empire of Oil,
Louis Proyect Mon 04 Sep 2006, 13:26 GMT
- [Marxism] Feliks Dzerzhinsky & the Challenge to Lenin & Trotsky experts,
RsKlump Mon 04 Sep 2006, 13:20 GMT
- [Marxism] Debating Open-Source Software at the U.N.: New York Times,
Sayan Bhattacharyya Mon 04 Sep 2006, 08:04 GMT
- [Marxism] Indian tribes fight for exemption from federal labor law,
Brian Shannon Mon 04 Sep 2006, 03:13 GMT
- [Marxism] Oaxaca?s Social Movement Develops Radical Vision for a National Government of the People,
Andrew Pollack Mon 04 Sep 2006, 01:02 GMT
- [Marxism] Lopez Obrador urges "plan for the transformation of Mexico",
Fred Feldman Mon 04 Sep 2006, 00:25 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]