Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: [Marxism] New Scottish Socialist Formation
Nick Fredman wrote:
> But one thing the Sheridan supporters might like to think about: even
> assuming *everything* Sherdian et al say about the nefarious nature of the
> leadership, the incorrect approach to women's liberation or anything else is
> true, surely you recognise that it seems from the outside very unprincipled
> and destructive to cause a big split, when it is, I understand, *weeks out
> from a conference*.
Given that the EC had previously ignored national committee votes, what would
be the point of awaiting a conference resolution only to have that ignored?
Given that the UL had changed the locks on HQ, what was the basis for a working
relationship?
Since several UL members had publicly declared that they could not and would
not work with Sheridan, what was the basis for continuing.
If the UL sends out sectarian notices in the name of the whole party, when they
were not approved by other EC members, then what are the prospects for
remaining united?
Given the atmosphere of physical threats and intimidation reported by many
members, and given the recent absurd stunt of burning a Wicker Tam in
Lanarkshire, is there any prospect of sensible discussion?
The fact is that the UL had already turned the party apparatus into its own
private property. So, continuing until the conference would delay the
inevitable, lose precious time and give the UL clique ample opportunity to fix
the conference too.
Incidentally, I don't think the real difference is over women's liberation: the
underlying issue is reformism: the stategy of parliamentarist respectability
pursued by the UL group in denouncing Sheridan, then leaking against him to the
press, then testifying against him is an artefact of an analysis that says that
the divide between reformism and revolution no longer matters and which, taken
to its logical conclusion, seeks change by purely electoral means. I think the
new coalition will have to have a renewed focus on grassroots street politics
and unions.
_________________________________________________________________
Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail.
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- RE: [Marxism] New Scottish Socialist Formation, (continued)
- RE: [Marxism] New Scottish Socialist Formation,
www.leninology. blogspot.com Wed 30 Aug 2006, 11:47 GMT
- RE: [Marxism] New Scottish Socialist Formation,
Darren Williams Wed 30 Aug 2006, 13:51 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] New Scottish Socialist Formation,
Nick Fredman Thu 31 Aug 2006, 03:34 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] New Scottish Socialist Formation,
Jscotlive Thu 31 Aug 2006, 05:06 GMT
- RE: [Marxism] New Scottish Socialist Formation,
www.leninology. blogspot.com Thu 31 Aug 2006, 08:04 GMT
- RE: [Marxism] New Scottish Socialist Formation,
Nick Fredman Thu 31 Aug 2006, 12:20 GMT
- RE: [Marxism] New Scottish Socialist Formation,
www.leninology. blogspot.com Thu 31 Aug 2006, 14:53 GMT
- RE: [Marxism] New Scottish Socialist Formation,
Nick Fredman Sat 02 Sep 2006, 04:48 GMT
- [Marxism] Fwd: Trotskyism & the Mid-East Archive,
dwalters Tue 29 Aug 2006, 17:46 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]