Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: [Marxism] two questions on Marx
- To: "Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition" <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Marxism] two questions on Marx
- From: "Austin, Andrew" <austina@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 20:41:44 -0500
- Thread-index: Aca9odAqau0Q+Y/YTlGS6v0IZ1n86QADqc5H
- Thread-topic: [Marxism] two questions on Marx
Because capitalist-worker was the dialectic.
________________________________
From: marxism-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of George Snedeker
Sent: Fri 8/11/2006 6:55 PM
To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition
Subject: [Marxism] two questions on Marx
1. why did Marx rely on a definition of the proletariat as industrial factory
workers when there were so many other members of the working class like
domestic servants, sailors, dock workers, mine workers, farm workers and of
course slaves.
why did Marx insist on defining the capitalist mode of production by the sale
of labor power. perhaps this was required by what he called the "law of value"
but I am not sure that this was a good enough reason for limiting the
definition of the CMP to the sale of labor power. this line of argument led
Marx to conclude that the proletariat was a revolutionary class because of its
centrality to the accumulation of capital, but was this not a theoretical as
well as a political error?
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]