Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[Marxism] Re: Electric cars



Anthony Boynton wrote:
"Electric cars, even with lead acid batteries, are definitely more environmentally friendly than are any fossil fuel burning vehicles.

"In the first place, current electric motor technolgy is 2-3 trimes more eneregy efficient than internal combustion engines.

"In the second place electricity can be generated without burning fossil fuels, and without burning any carbon: wind, tidal, geothermal, hydroelectric, solar
and nuclear are all possible. (All have their environmental prices, but none emit CO2 into the atmosphere.) "

Ah, we can relax. No need to stop building new roads, freeways, suburbs and exurbs, shopping malls, car dealerships, we can keep the massive steel and rubber and plastics companies producing their products, using vast amounts of energy (from whatever source) and shipping their four-wheel icons of civilisation all over the world...

There is a tendency to think that the invention of cleaner versions of car technology and energy generation mean that we can simply convert our existing technological infrastructure over to cleaner, carbon-neutral energy inputs and then continue on just as before.

Nice theory, but the vast infrastructure that backs up car-centric society and its mind-boggling waste of energy and other resources would be much easier to simply shut down (and to convert to producing useful stuff instead of cars).

Good luck to anthony converting the old Mazda to an electric car, all this sort of stuff is fine (and probably fun), but let's not kid ourselves that it is much of a positive environmental development. Even GWB reckons that “Keeping America competitive requires affordable energy. And here we have a serious problem: America is addicted to oil, which is often imported from unstable parts of the world. The best way to break this addiction is through technology. Since 2001, we have spent nearly $10 billion to develop cleaner, cheaper, and more reliable alternative energy sources -- and we are on the threshold of incredible advances.” Let's keep our eyes on the ball: destroying capitalism, not eco-reforming it.

Ben Courtice
/
/

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]