Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] Secular Chauvinism (was How to answer these questions?)
- To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Marxism] Secular Chauvinism (was How to answer these questions?)
- From: Einde O'Callaghan <einde@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:14:12 +0200
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
Louis R Godena schrieb:
My claim is, instead, that there exists secular chauvinism, a common
vice among Western leftists, which makes them assume that secular
nationalism and secular socialism of any variety is better than Islam
of any variety in any respect. That assumption is contradicted by
historical evidence, when it comes to treatment of ethnic and
religious minorities, for instance.
On the whole, the more advanced a society, the more secular its
character. Ancient, malevolent superstitions like Islam (and to some
extent the "western" religions) are the response of people afraid of the
future. I mean, how can one respect a civilization that sends its
members by the hundreds of thousands to the roof-tops to shout "God is
Great!"?
The defiance of the hundreds of thousands of Iranians who went onto
their rooftops shouting "Allahu akbar!" during the Iranian revolution
was a vedry powerfulo sign that the Shah had lost control. Since at the
beginning none of these people really knew if their neighbours would
dare to do so too, I think they deserve youre respect.
We shouldn't forget that the Russion revolution of 1905 started with a
demonstration of tens of thousands marchivn behind religious icons and
addressing an appeal to the "Little Father" with the Bolsheviks making
up a relatively insignificant part with a couple of banners in the midst
of the essentially religious mainfestation.
This isn't to say that the two events were directly comparable, since in
Russia the Orthodox church was the state religion whereas in Iran the
Shhites were in opposition to the Shah.
And, I would think that (again, on the whole) it was people
like the Communists who were most conscientious of the rights of
minorities.
I depends on who you define as Communists - the chauvinism of the
Czechoslovak Stalinist leaders against the Sudenten Germans makes pretty
sick reading. Ironically Gottwald, the leader of the party, was himself
of German ethnic origin, as his name clearly reveals.
Also the anti-semitism (in the sense of promoting anti-Jewish
sentiments) used by the Polish stalinists in their propaganda against
the student movement in the late 1960s (under the guise of anti-Zionism)
also makes pretty sick reading.
And the Stalinist deportations of whole people's (Crimean Tartars,
Chechens, Volga Germans etc.) during the Second World War doesn't
exactly show great respect for the rights of ethnic minorities.
Einde O'Callaghan
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]