Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] NYTimes report sees Hezbollah, Nasrallah as winner so far -- US as big loser
- To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Marxism] NYTimes report sees Hezbollah, Nasrallah as winner so far -- US as big loser
- From: <g.maclennan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:25:43 +1000 (EST)
Lou Wrote:
"The net result would be a radical Islamic state on Israel's Northern border.
Absolutely amazing. "
I have turned on Fox and watch the interview with two ex-generals. the coverage
of the Qana atrocity which backed up their talk was carefully edited to
eliminate any sight of bodies.
The gernals though agreed that militarily Israel had not done well and
politically it was an absolute disaster. I th ink at moments like this the
bourgeoisie are confronted by one of their key ocntradicitons. They have to
know the world in order to lie about it. You cannot dominate if you do not
understand, if your intellectual models are out of whack with reality.
Yet that is precisely what happens to the powerful. Their feedback circuits
get choked with the prattle of the sychophants.
It now seems that the USA & Israel truly thought this could be as Uri Avnery
puts it a "nice little war". A three week jaunt to jolt the Arabs into doing
what they should - start killing one another.
That did not happen hence the need to escalate and that is why Qana happened.
After Qana what can they do? Well they have gone back to the steady diet of
killing Palestinians while they think through the problem.
What is strange here is how Rice's rhetoric is the negative image of the truth.
She says she opposes a cease fire because that would leave Hizbollah in place
and prevent a New Middle East from emerging.
The truth now is that an Israeli ceasefire or apology or
cessation or some tactical maneuver cobbled together by Bush and Blair will
leave in place the force that will produce another massacre of Arabs in the
future. That force is of course American Imperialism.
Sabra and Shatil in 1982, Qana in 1996, Qana in 2006 and so it will go on until
Imerialism is decisively defeated. Only then will a new Middle East be born.
regards
Gary
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] New York Times Editorial: What’s Left of the Latin Left July 31, 2006,
Ralph Johansen Mon 31 Jul 2006, 08:15 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] IRSP: The Plough 3.29,
Geoff Collier Mon 31 Jul 2006, 07:57 GMT
- [Marxism] 86.9% of Lebanese Support Resistance against Israel,
Yoshie Furuhashi Mon 31 Jul 2006, 05:17 GMT
- [Marxism] After latest slaughter of children, Israel blinks,
Fred Feldman Mon 31 Jul 2006, 03:34 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] NYTimes report sees Hezbollah, Nasrallah as winner so far -- US as big loser,
g.maclennan Mon 31 Jul 2006, 03:26 GMT
- [Marxism] re: George Soros v's George W Bush,
Rohan Gaiswinkler Mon 31 Jul 2006, 03:11 GMT
- [Marxism] MEXICO CITY: Mexican leftists swarm capital in election protest,
Walter Lippmann Mon 31 Jul 2006, 02:44 GMT
- [Marxism] pictures of the Portland demo,
Mark Lause Mon 31 Jul 2006, 02:17 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]