[Marxism] Consensus grows that Lopez Obrador win will make an actual difference

["Fred Feldman" <ffeldman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

June 28, 2006


Nearly Half of Mexico Lives Under the Poverty Line


Mexico: Their Brand is Crisis


By MARK WEISBROT

A brilliant documentary by Rachel Boynton, released this year,
chronicles the adventures of one of America's most influential public
relations firms as it applies the most advanced polling, advertising,
and focus group techniques to the 2002 presidential elections in
Bolivia. The company, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner, has the daunting task of
winning the election for Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada, a former president
who speaks Spanish with an American accent and is not well-liked.

The firm decides that the only way "Goni," as he is called, can succeed
is to convince the voters that if his opponent wins, the country will
suffer a devastating economic meltdown. "Our brand," explains an
operative of the firm, "is crisis" -- hence the title of the film.

This has become the default strategy for incumbent political parties in
Latin America, as one government after another faces opponents from the
left. Next up is Mexico, where the ruling National Action Party (PAN)
faces a strong challenge from former Mexico City major Andres Manuel
Lopez Obrador of the Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD) on July 2.
Lopez Obrador is a popular -- some would say populist -- left-of-center
leader whose main campaign slogan is "for the good of everyone, the poor
first."

It's pretty clear that Mexico needs to reconsider its economic policies.


Over the 25 years since 1980, income per person in Mexico has grown by
just 17 percent. To see how bad this is, one need only look at the 20
years from 1960-1980, when the country's per capita income grew by 99
percent. If the Mexican economy had simply continued to grow at its
pre-1980 rate, average income in Mexico would be at the level of Spain
today. There would be far fewer Mexicans looking to emigrate illegally
to the United States.

Mexico's pre-1980 growth was good but nothing spectacular for a
developing country -- South Korea grew more than twice as fast and
Taiwan at nearly three times Mexico's rate over the same period. So the
country's past growth performance is a reasonable benchmark by which to
compare the unprecedented growth failure of the last quarter-century.
Many have hailed Mexico's post NAFTA growth as a success, but even this
was only about a third of its pre-1980 performance.

However, most people do not understand what economic growth is or why it
is so important. For comparison, imagine a discussion about baseball
where hardly anyone understood batting averages, and those who
understood them did not distinguish between good and bad averages,
labeling a .175 average "outstanding."

As a result, the focus of criticism is on Mexico's poverty, which is
mainly a result of the growth failure. In 2004, nearly half the country
lived below the official poverty line of about $4.00 per day.

Will a left government cause an economic crisis in Mexico?

It is worth recalling that the same was said about President Lula da
Silva when he ran for office on behalf of the leftist Workers' Party in
Brazil four years ago, but the crisis never materialized. It is often
maintained that this was because Lula did everything that the financial
markets wanted. But across the border in Argentina, President Nestor
Kirchner did what the financial markets didn't want, and the economy has
been booming at about 9 percent annually for more than three years.

Latin America's left governments are doing pretty well, regardless of
whether Washington or anyone else approves of their policies. Venezuela
is tied with Argentina as the fastest-growing economy in the hemisphere.
And Evo Morales has only been president of Bolivia for half a year, but
the government's increased revenues from natural gas have helped to fund
its reform program, and its re-nationalization of the industry has not
caused an economic or political crisis.

Mexico will likely face problems as the big imbalances in the U.S.
economy -- the housing bubble, trade deficit, and unsustainably low
long-term interest rates -- are corrected. Our last recession in 2001
cause a downturn in Mexico's economy, and the next one will probably do
the same. But Mexico's current economic policies, which tend to
sacrifice growth and employment in the fight against inflation, may be
the wrong recipe for recovery. Mexico may need a Franklin D. Roosevelt
at the helm in the next few years, rather than a Herbert Hoover.

Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy
Research, in  <http://www.cepr.net/> Washington, D.C. He is the author,
with Dean Baker, of Social
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0226035468/counterpunchmaga>
Security: the Phony Crisis. He can be reached at: weisbrot@xxxxxxxx




<http://promos.hotbar.com/promos/promodll.dll?RunPromo&El=&SG=&RAND=1357
&partner=hbtools> Upgrade Your Email - Click here!

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism