Re: [Marxism] The Duality of Marxism: is capitalism

["Mike Friedman" <mikedf@xxxxxxxx>]

Unfortunately, I didn't write the remarks Haines attributes to me. I wish
I could participate more fully in this (and other) discussions, but, alas,
I can't... In my brief response to Alam, I only noted that Meszaros seems
to deal with his concern.


Mike

> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 08:35:02 -0400 (EDT)
> From: brownh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Haines Brown)
> Subject: Re: [Marxism] The Duality of Marxism: is capitalism
>       totalizing or
>
> Although I appreciate the honesty and thoughtfulness of Michael
> Friedman's comment on the "totalizing" aspect of Marxism, the thrust
> of his explanation of the a presumed "crisis" in Marxist thought ends
> up, I fear, in its rejection. Either out of ignorance or
> dim-witedness, I don't see that there is a crisis at all, at least not
> in Marxism as a science. And so let me re-thread Michael's needle to
> evaluate the steps he took to arrive at his conclusion.
>
.


________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism