Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[Marxism] Fwd from United for Peace of Pierce County



Cogent remarks by Mark Jensen, Pacific Lutheran University French Department
chairman, leader of United for Peace of Pierce County:

-----Original Message-----
From: jensenmk [mailto:jensenmk@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 10:31 AM
To: jensenmk
Subject: [snow-news] NYT, CNN: In 2006, GOP to exploit Dem. divisions by
'unambiguously embracing' Iraq war


NEWS: In 2006, GOP to exploit Democratic divisions by 'unambiguously
embracing' Iraq war (NYT)

[On Thursday, the U.S. Senate voted 87-13 "against setting a firm deadline
for
withdrawing American troops from Iraq," the *New York Times*
eported.[1] --
CNN reported the vote as 86-13, and added that "Minutes later, the Senate
rejected the proposal more popular with Democrats, a nonbinding
resolution --
which was offered by Sens. Carl Levin, D-Michigan, and Jack Reed, D-Rhode
Island -- that would call for the administration to begin withdrawing
troops,
but with no timetable for the war's end. That was a closer vote, 60-39."[2]
-- As these votes illustrate, the Democratic party has failed to reach
consensus on the Iraq war, a failure Republicans hope to exploit in the 2006
elections. -- In a front-page piece on Thursday, the *New York Times*
reported that Republicans will adopt a political analysis contained in "a
74-page briefing book to Congressional offices from the Pentagon to provide
ammunition for what White House officials say will be a central line of
attack
against Democrats from now through the midterm elections: that the
withdrawal
being advocated by Democrats would mean thousands of troops would have died
for nothing, would give extremists a launching pad from which to build an
Islamo-fascist empire and would hand the United States its must humiliating
defeat since Vietnam."[3] -- The briefing book implements a politics of
fear
by nonsensically merging the Salafism of al-Qaeda with other currents of
radical Islam to form an imaginary monolithic "Islamo-fascist" threat, just
as
rhetorical strategies of the Cold War systematically potrayed movements for
national liberation and against social justice as part of a monolithic world
Communist movement. -- NOTE: The term "Islamo-fascist" is a relatively
new
addition to the rhetorical panoply of the U.S. national security state. --
The history of its use in the *New York Times* is notable. --
"Islamo-fascist" first appeared in the *Times* only fifteen months ago, in
an
article quoting Geert Wilders, a "rising right-wing politician" in the Dutch
parliament. -- Wilders's position is that "Islamic dogmas and democracy
are
incompatible," and he advocates a five-year suspension of "third-world
immigration," the closing of radical mosques in the Netherlands, and the
preventive arrest of terrorist suspects or, as he calls them,
"Islamo-fascist
thugs" (*New York Times*, Mar, 4, 2005). -- The term "Islamo-fascist" next
appears a year later, toward the end of a long piece in the *New York Times
Magazine* about the Sudan conflict, in a quotation from Roger Winter,
special
representative for the Sudan conflict at the U.S. State Department: "If you
want to liquidate an Islamo-fascist regime that committed genocide, the way
to
do it that is accepted by the international community is through the
[Comprehensive Peace Agreement that ended the North-South war] and
prosecutions by the I.C.C." (Elizabeth Rubin, "If Not Peace, Then Justice,"
*New York Times Magazine*, Apr. 2, 2006). -- Today's use of
"Islamo-fascist"
is the third appearance of the term in the columns of the *New York Times*.
-- The migration of the term "Islamo-fascist" from a racist far-right Dutch
party to the Dept. of State to the Pentagon to the Republican leadership in
Washington, D.C., is instructive. --Mark]

http://www.ufppc.org/content/view/4697/

1.

U.S.

Washington

SENATE VOTES AGAINST IRAQ DEADLINE WITHDRAWAL
By David Stout

New York Times
June 22, 2006

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/22/washington/22cnd-cong.html

2.

Politics

SENATE REJECTS CALLS FOR WITHDRAWAL FROM IRAQ

CNN
June 22, 2006

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/22/iraq.senate.ap/index.html

3.

U.S.

Washington

G.O.P. DECIDES TO EMBRACE WAR AS ISSUE
By Jim Rutenberg and Adam Nagourney

New York Times
June 22, 2006
Page A1

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/22/washington/22capital.html



________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]