Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] López Obrador
June 17, 2006
Mexico's Populist Tilts at a Privileged Elite
By JAMES C. McKINLEY Jr.
MEXICO CITY, June 16 ? It is the fourth stop on a long, rainy day of
campaigning, but when the leftist candidate rolls into the small coastal
town of Tonalá, in southern Mexico, the soaked crowd comes alive with
deafening chants of "Obrador! Obrador!"
The candidate, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, gray-haired and slightly
stooped, with a nasal voice and a boyish, freckled face, seems to suck up
their energy, amplify it, and hurl it back in the form of a simple message.
For too long, he booms, politicians, business owners and their families
have gotten rich and evaded taxes while the working class has remained
mired in poverty.
"The poor pay taxes on everything they buy," he says, cutting to the heart
of his theme. "Those of the pure upper class, the influential, don't pay
the taxes."
With less than three weeks before the July 2 election, Mr. López Obrador, a
leftist former Mexico City mayor, is locked in a dead heat with Felipe
Calderón, the conservative candidate from President Vicente Fox's National
Action Party. After seesawing for weeks, all opinion polls now suggest the
race is too close to call.
Win or lose, Mr. López Obrador remains the focus of the election, a
polarizing figure who has dragged Mexico's enduring class conflict into the
light. In recent speeches, he has vowed to end what he calls "the
privileges" of a powerful oligarchy that has dominated politics here for
centuries.
His fiery appeals have turned the election into a referendum on whether the
country wants to stick with the free trade and pro-business policies of the
Fox administration or join the growing number of Latin American countries ?
Venezuela, Bolivia and Peru among them ? that have elected populist
left-wingers who want to assert greater state control over the economy and
funnel more wealth to the poor.
But to describe Mr. López Obrador as another populist promising handouts to
get votes is to miss the most salient part of his message for his
supporters. In their eyes, he is a reformer who has promised to stamp out
corruption and make corporations and the rich pay more taxes. He has vowed
to end the sweetheart deals for government contracts, to stop the
government from bailing out failing businesses and to slash the salaries of
top bureaucrats and elected officials, who make far more than their
counterparts in the United States.
In New York City terms, he wants to dismantle Tammany Hall.
"This is the principal problem of the country," he said in an interview.
"Because these privileges at the same time impoverish people and affect the
country's development."
Mr. López Obrador's adversaries and critics portray him as a dangerous
populist who will bankrupt the country with social welfare schemes. They
say he shows an authoritarian streak, ignoring laws he disagrees with and
filling the streets with protesters if things do not go his way. They
accuse him of being paranoid, too, seeing plots everywhere. Some
biographers maintain he sees himself as the embodiment of the nation's
poor, a Christ-like savior.
"He sees himself as the incarnation of the masses," said George W. Grayson,
a professor at the College of William and Mary who has just published a
biography of Mr. López Obrador. "He views himself, I believe, as a messiah
to uplift the downtrodden."
Mr. López Obrador calls this litany of characterizations ridiculous,
especially the notion that he has a messiah complex. "Sometimes it makes me
laugh, because there is no basis for it," he said. "The only thing is I
support popular causes with conviction, and to them it seems like I'm
causing them harm. They also say that I am authoritarian. It's not true. I
never have been. I'm a democrat."
If Mr. López Obrador's rhetoric is full of class conflict that rattles
business owners and the middle to upper class, there is a reason for it.
Poverty, job creation and wealth distribution are the most urgent issues
facing modern Mexico, and the failure to address them has driven some 12
million Mexicans north to the United States.
About half of Mexicans still live below the poverty line ? earning less
than $4 per family member each day ? and one in five earns too little to
buy enough food for a healthful diet, according to the World Bank. More
than 45 percent of the nation's wealth is held by the elite 10 percent, and
that concentration may be even greater since most of Mexico's superrich do
not respond to government surveys, poverty experts say. The gap between
rich and poor has closed only slightly since the free trade agreement with
the United States took effect more than a decade ago.
Tax evasion is rampant. The last official study, conducted in 2002,
estimated about 40 percent of businesses and 70 percent of professionals
and small business owners either cheat on their taxes or pay none at all.
The poor do not pay income tax, but are hit with a 15 percent sales tax
every time they buy clothes or other durable goods.
How to remedy these problems is where Mr. López Obrador and his opponent
divide. Mr. Calderón insists that staying the course on free trade will
bring jobs and growth that will help everyone. He has proposed cutting
income taxes for the rich and businesses by putting in place a single rate,
which he says will spur investment.
On the stump, Mr. López Obrador, on the other hand, calls for "profound
change, a change to the roots," and tells crowds that Mexico today is very
like Mexico under the dictatorship of Porfirio Díaz, just before the 1910
revolution. The government, he says, serves the interests of a few.
"The problem is with a minority that has privileges and wants to maintain
those privileges," he said during a swing last week through Chiapas, the
southern state that is home to Tonalá, and where complaints of poverty and
political exclusion fueled an insurrection in 1994.
Mr. Calderón has charged that Mr. López Obrador's prescriptions would lead
to financial ruin and claims that as mayor of Mexico City Mr. López Obrador
piled up debt to finance social programs, while presiding over a steep rise
in crime and corruption. The underlying message in most of Mr. Calderón's
attack advertisements is that Mr. López Obrador is a leftist dictator in
the making.
But Mr. López Obrador's record as mayor does not suggest he has a wild-eyed
revolutionary lurking in his soul. It is true that the city's debt rose by
a third during his tenure, but he also improved tax collection
dramatically, by about 44 percent. He slashed more than 500 jobs from the
bureaucracy, eliminated perquisites for officials and cut salaries. In the
end, he balanced the budget, raising both spending and revenue by about 60
percent.
He did ignore or refuse to enforce some laws the city assembly had passed
that he did not agree with, among them a measure to require auto insurance.
At the same time, he established a package of welfare programs, like cash
grants for the elderly, people with disabilities and single mothers,
benefits which made him immensely popular, despite continuing problems with
water supply and crime.
His plan for the country is similar. He says he would take those programs
and others like them nationwide and pay for them by cracking down on tax
evasion, cutting salaries of top government officials, and slashing other
waste to raise about $20 billion.
He hopes this infusion of money will jump-start a stagnant economy and
create a ripple effect. He also believes that the country's oil wealth,
properly channeled, could be used to industrialize Mexico, rather than
being used as a kind of slush fund for the government, as it has been for
decades.
Aware of jitters among investors, Mr. López Obrador has dispatched his
economic adviser, Rogelio Ramírez, to New York City several times to assure
bankers and Wall Street brokerages that Mr. López Obrador will not provoke
an economic crisis. "He's extremely pragmatic on the operational side," Mr.
Ramírez said.
Mr. López Obrador, a 53-year-old widower and father of three boys, spent
his early years in the riverside village of Tepetitán in Tabasco, the son
of an oil worker turned shopkeeper.
He studied social sciences at the national university in Mexico City. His
first job was running an institute for the Chontal Indians. For six years,
he lived in the Indian communities, sleeping in dirt-floor shacks. It was
there, he says, his commitment to the poor was forged.
Though he started out in the Institutional Revolutionary Party, the machine
that controlled Mexico for seven decades until 2000, Mr. López Obrador quit
in 1983, he says, because it became clear the pro-democracy reformers
within the party would not succeed in Tabasco. In 1988, he joined what
would later become the left-wing Party of the Democratic Revolution and
lost a race for governor of Tabasco. He lost again in 1994, and finally won
the Mexico City mayor's seat in 2000.
Though he talks little about his home life, by the standards of Mexican
politicians he lives like an ascetic in a modest house and drives an
inexpensive car. He has promised to cut the president's salary in half if
he is elected.
On the campaign trail, he refuses to stand under an awning if the crowd is
in the sun or rain. He takes commercial flights to campaign events and
often stays in cheap hotels. On one recent trip through the state of
Coahuila, he washed and changed clothes in a filthy bathroom at a gasoline
station before a rally. On last week's tour through Chiapas, his car had a
minor accident with a van carrying a dozen people to work. He climbed out
and apologized to the commuters.
To the people who come to his rallies, mostly poor, some illiterate, Mr.
López Obrador is one of them. He speaks in folksy rhythms and idioms they
recognize. They affectionately call him by his first name or Amlo, a
nickname formed by his initials.
"The man seems very honest, very simple," said María Consuelo Ayala Pérez,
a mother of 10 in Cintalapa, Chiapas, last week. "He's done a lot of good
in Mexico City. When Fox came into office, he said there was going to be a
change, but a change was never seen."
For some of Mr. López Obrador's detractors, it is this very ability to
communicate with ordinary Mexicans, especially the poor, that makes him a
dangerous man. Mexico, as well as the rest of Latin America, has a long
history of people who have used the desperation of the poor as a tool to
whip up anger against the rich and gain power. Some critics count President
Hugo Chávez of Venezuela among them.
"I think Amlo truly feels he's the Redeemer of Mexico, but his reign is of
this world," said Enrique Krauze, a historian. "For this reason, even
though he says, 'I don't want power for power's sake,' he wants it immensely."
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] World Cup Patriotism, (continued)
- [Marxism] FW: Maoists to help govern Nepal (Associated Press),
Richard Fidler Sat 17 Jun 2006, 14:26 GMT
- [Marxism] López Obrador,
Louis Proyect Sat 17 Jun 2006, 14:25 GMT
- [Marxism] Igaal Niddam, "We Are Arab Jews in Israel",
Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 17 Jun 2006, 13:19 GMT
- [Marxism] World Cup Patriotism,
Nestor Gorojovsky Sat 17 Jun 2006, 12:36 GMT
- [Marxism] Jünge Welt,
Nestor Gorojovsky Sat 17 Jun 2006, 12:36 GMT
- [Marxism] Re: The Anti-Deutscherites,
Paul Flewers Sat 17 Jun 2006, 11:49 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]