RE: [Marxism] Internationalism v. National Chauvanism: "I would havegotten a different result in America."

["Joaquin Bustelo" <jbustelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Prem K Govindaswamy: "The first is that the author goes under the assumption
that the UN is supposed to be an egalitarian body representing human needs,
when it is really a bourgeois institution."

I would add that it isn't just a generically "bourgeois" but imperialist.
Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Thailand and India are all "bourgeois," but it is
not their interests as *nations,* even bourgeois nations, that is being
represented by the U.N. 

Joaquín


________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism