Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[Marxism] Wen Ho Lee, Valerie Plame Affair, COINTELPRO - and RICO



A few months ago, several representatives of the media reacted with outrage to the direct payment and planting of stories written by the White House or paid columnists who presented White House views.

This was followed by the Jeff Gannon affair, a fake news reporter who received white house press corps passes. He was exposed as a plant, probably solely because of his Internet gay porn site. In other words, we don't know how many are legitimate or fake or even whether the legitimate ones are in bed with the government.

The media has had a field day with these egregious examples of news that was bought and paid for. Yet the apparently legitimate media itself is intimately involved with presenting the government position. Is there really any difference between a "leak" and a "plant"? Aren't they the same thing? And when a reporter protects his sources, what is he or she protecting? Most of the time what is being protected is that fact that the reporter is operating as a shill for the government.

This was obviously the case when it was reported as news that Cuba had interfered with the operation of the U.S. interest section in Cuba, without noting that tropical storm Alberto dropped an immense amount of rain in Western Cuba. For me it was also obvious when NPR reported on a "crime wave" in Venezuela.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5477409

I start with the RICO act, which I am opposed to because of its potential use against anyone working for social change. However, the following description of its origins as a tool to be used against the Mafia presents a fitting moral compass for the capitalist media.

Brian Shannon
============================

(1)

Because the Mafia family has engaged in these criminal actions for generations, the criminal actions constitute a pattern of racketeering activity. The government can criminally prosecute the Godfather under RICO and send him to jail even if the Godfather has never personally killed, extorted, bribed or engaged in any criminal behavior. The Godfather can be imprisoned because he operated and managed a criminal enterprise that engaged in such acts. Moreover, under section 1964(c) of the RICO Act, the victims of the Mafia family (i.e., the extorted businessman, the employers whose employees were bribed, debtors of the loan shark, the family of a murder victim) can sue the Godfather civilly and recover the economic losses they sustained by reason of the Mafia family's pattern of racketeering.

As a practical matter, the closer a plaintiff's case is to the Mafia scenario described above, the better chance the plaintiff has in succeeding under the RICO Act. Given the diverse factual scenarios that may confront attorneys and parties under RICO, it is always helpful to analogize non-Mafia factual scenarios to the prototypical RICO claim against the Mafia. It is always helpful to ask: who stands in the position of the Godfather, i.e., the defendant person? What is the equivalent of the Mafia family, i.e., the enterprise? This will give you a good start in evaluating the merits of any RICO claim you confront. If the facts are well-suited to the Mafia analogy, you likely have a stronger claim.

http://www.ricoact.com/ricoact/nutshell.asp#intro

________________

(2)

The five media heavies who shamelessly promoted the government’s lies about the Los Alamos scientist chose to settle today rather than reveal their government sources.

[Wen Ho] Lee was savaged by a media fueled by government rumors that he was spying for China, an accusation he was never officially charged with. Lee was imprisoned in solitary confinement for nine months in 1999-2000 and ultimately received an apology from the judge who heard his case. Truthdig says: The media was not defending freedom of the press but their own right to operate as a megaphone for government agents with an agenda to slander an American citizen. The media went to bat for government agents who broke the law. When will those agents be held accountable?

http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/20060602_victory_wen_ho_lee/

____________________

(3)

(d) The FBI has also used intelligence as a vehicle for covert efforts to influence social policy and political action.
. . .
In its efforts to "protect society," the FBI engaged in activities which necessarily affected the processes by which American citizens make decisions. In doing so, it distorted and exaggerated facts, made use of the mass media, and attacked the leadership of groups which it considered threats to the social order.
. . .
The essence of democracy is the belief that the people must be free to make decisions about matters of public policy. The FBI's actions interfered with the democratic process, because attitudes within the Bureau toward social change led to the belief that such intervention formed a part of its obligation to protect society. When a governmental agency clandestinely tries to impose its views of what is right upon the American people, then the democratic process is undermined.
. . .

[Numerous examples of "name checks" requested by the White House]

(i) Use of the Media

The FBI attempted to influence public opinion by supplying information or articles to "confidential sources" in the news media. The FBI's Crime Records Division 105 was responsible for covert liaison with the media to advance two main domestic intelligence objectives: 106

(1) providing derogatory information to the media intended to generally discredit the activities or ideas of targeted groups or individuals; and (2) disseminating unfavorable articles, news releases, and background information in order to disrupt particular activities.

Typically, a local FBI agent would provide information to a "friendly news source" on the condition "that the Bureau's interest in these matters is to be kept in the strictest confidence." 107 Thomas E. Bishop, former Director of the Crime Records Division, testified that he kept a list of the Bureau's "press friends" in his desk. 108 Bishop and one of his predecessors indicated that the FBI sometimes refused to cooperate with reporters critical of the Bureau or its Director. 109

Bishop stated that as a "general rule," the Bureau disseminated only "public record information" to its media contacts, but this category was viewed by the Bureau to include any information which could conceivably be obtained by close scrutiny of even the most obscure publications. 110

Within these parameters, background information supplied to reporters "in most cases [could] include everything" in the Bureau files on a targeted individual; the selection of information for publication would be left to the reporter's judgment. 111

There are numerous examples of authorization for the preparation and dissemination of unfavorable information to discredit generally the activities and ideas of a target; 112

[Numerous examples of planting of stories follows.]

http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIce.htm

_______________

(4)

It's now known that Rove had discussed Plame's CIA employment with conservative columnist Robert Novak, who exposed her identity less than a week later, citing two unidentified senior administration officials.
. . .
It was the Rove-Cooper conversation on July 11, 2003, that threw the investigation back on the front pages a year ago.

Facing jail unless he cooperated with prosecutors, Cooper testified that Rove said Wilson's wife worked at the "agency" and that she was responsible for sending her husband on a CIA mission to Africa in 2002 to check out intelligence about Iraq.

http://www.forbes.com/home/feeds/ap/2006/06/13/ap2812402.html



________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]