Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Wen Ho Lee, Valerie Plame Affair, COINTELPRO - and RICO
A few months ago, several representatives of the media reacted with
outrage to the direct payment and planting of stories written by the
White House or paid columnists who presented White House views.
This was followed by the Jeff Gannon affair, a fake news reporter who
received white house press corps passes. He was exposed as a plant,
probably solely because of his Internet gay porn site. In other
words, we don't know how many are legitimate or fake or even whether
the legitimate ones are in bed with the government.
The media has had a field day with these egregious examples of news
that was bought and paid for. Yet the apparently legitimate media
itself is intimately involved with presenting the government
position. Is there really any difference between a "leak" and a
"plant"? Aren't they the same thing? And when a reporter protects his
sources, what is he or she protecting? Most of the time what is being
protected is that fact that the reporter is operating as a shill for
the government.
This was obviously the case when it was reported as news that Cuba
had interfered with the operation of the U.S. interest section in
Cuba, without noting that tropical storm Alberto dropped an immense
amount of rain in Western Cuba. For me it was also obvious when NPR
reported on a "crime wave" in Venezuela.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5477409
I start with the RICO act, which I am opposed to because of its
potential use against anyone working for social change. However, the
following description of its origins as a tool to be used against the
Mafia presents a fitting moral compass for the capitalist media.
Brian Shannon
============================
(1)
Because the Mafia family has engaged in these criminal actions for
generations, the criminal actions constitute a pattern of
racketeering activity. The government can criminally prosecute the
Godfather under RICO and send him to jail even if the Godfather has
never personally killed, extorted, bribed or engaged in any criminal
behavior. The Godfather can be imprisoned because he operated and
managed a criminal enterprise that engaged in such acts. Moreover,
under section 1964(c) of the RICO Act, the victims of the Mafia
family (i.e., the extorted businessman, the employers whose employees
were bribed, debtors of the loan shark, the family of a murder
victim) can sue the Godfather civilly and recover the economic losses
they sustained by reason of the Mafia family's pattern of racketeering.
As a practical matter, the closer a plaintiff's case is to the Mafia
scenario described above, the better chance the plaintiff has in
succeeding under the RICO Act. Given the diverse factual scenarios
that may confront attorneys and parties under RICO, it is always
helpful to analogize non-Mafia factual scenarios to the prototypical
RICO claim against the Mafia. It is always helpful to ask: who stands
in the position of the Godfather, i.e., the defendant person? What is
the equivalent of the Mafia family, i.e., the enterprise? This will
give you a good start in evaluating the merits of any RICO claim you
confront. If the facts are well-suited to the Mafia analogy, you
likely have a stronger claim.
http://www.ricoact.com/ricoact/nutshell.asp#intro
________________
(2)
The five media heavies who shamelessly promoted the government’s lies
about the Los Alamos scientist chose to settle today rather than
reveal their government sources.
[Wen Ho] Lee was savaged by a media fueled by government rumors that
he was spying for China, an accusation he was never officially
charged with. Lee was imprisoned in solitary confinement for nine
months in 1999-2000 and ultimately received an apology from the judge
who heard his case. Truthdig says: The media was not defending
freedom of the press but their own right to operate as a megaphone
for government agents with an agenda to slander an American citizen.
The media went to bat for government agents who broke the law. When
will those agents be held accountable?
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/20060602_victory_wen_ho_lee/
____________________
(3)
(d) The FBI has also used intelligence as a vehicle for covert
efforts to influence social policy and political action.
. . .
In its efforts to "protect society," the FBI engaged in activities
which necessarily affected the processes by which American citizens
make decisions. In doing so, it distorted and exaggerated facts, made
use of the mass media, and attacked the leadership of groups which it
considered threats to the social order.
. . .
The essence of democracy is the belief that the people must be free
to make decisions about matters of public policy. The FBI's actions
interfered with the democratic process, because attitudes within the
Bureau toward social change led to the belief that such intervention
formed a part of its obligation to protect society. When a
governmental agency clandestinely tries to impose its views of what
is right upon the American people, then the democratic process is
undermined.
. . .
[Numerous examples of "name checks" requested by the White House]
(i) Use of the Media
The FBI attempted to influence public opinion by supplying
information or articles to "confidential sources" in the news media.
The FBI's Crime Records Division 105 was responsible for covert
liaison with the media to advance two main domestic intelligence
objectives: 106
(1) providing derogatory information to the media intended to
generally discredit the activities or ideas of targeted groups or
individuals; and (2) disseminating unfavorable articles, news
releases, and background information in order to disrupt particular
activities.
Typically, a local FBI agent would provide information to a "friendly
news source" on the condition "that the Bureau's interest in these
matters is to be kept in the strictest confidence." 107 Thomas E.
Bishop, former Director of the Crime Records Division, testified that
he kept a list of the Bureau's "press friends" in his desk. 108
Bishop and one of his predecessors indicated that the FBI sometimes
refused to cooperate with reporters critical of the Bureau or its
Director. 109
Bishop stated that as a "general rule," the Bureau disseminated only
"public record information" to its media contacts, but this category
was viewed by the Bureau to include any information which could
conceivably be obtained by close scrutiny of even the most obscure
publications. 110
Within these parameters, background information supplied to reporters
"in most cases [could] include everything" in the Bureau files on a
targeted individual; the selection of information for publication
would be left to the reporter's judgment. 111
There are numerous examples of authorization for the preparation and
dissemination of unfavorable information to discredit generally the
activities and ideas of a target; 112
[Numerous examples of planting of stories follows.]
http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/cointelpro/churchfinalreportIIce.htm
_______________
(4)
It's now known that Rove had discussed Plame's CIA employment with
conservative columnist Robert Novak, who exposed her identity less
than a week later, citing two unidentified senior administration
officials.
. . .
It was the Rove-Cooper conversation on July 11, 2003, that threw the
investigation back on the front pages a year ago.
Facing jail unless he cooperated with prosecutors, Cooper testified
that Rove said Wilson's wife worked at the "agency" and that she was
responsible for sending her husband on a CIA mission to Africa in
2002 to check out intelligence about Iraq.
http://www.forbes.com/home/feeds/ap/2006/06/13/ap2812402.html
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] Re: Australian troops back in East Timor, (continued)
- RE: [Marxism] David Corn on Zarqawi. A gene-carrying memberofthe"civilized world" speaks out for assassination and occupation,
Mike Friedman Wed 14 Jun 2006, 16:11 GMT
- [Marxism] Wen Ho Lee, Valerie Plame Affair, COINTELPRO - and RICO,
Brian Shannon Wed 14 Jun 2006, 16:09 GMT
- [Marxism] Internationalism v. National Chauvanism: "I would have gotten a different result in America.",
Prem K Govindaswamy Wed 14 Jun 2006, 16:05 GMT
- [Marxism] Writing pro-gay marriage editorial gets adjunct professor fired,
Louis Proyect Wed 14 Jun 2006, 15:19 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]