Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: [Marxism] Female Pundits Could Use Help With Hate Mail/ from John Olmsted
The discussion between Steffi and Louis is quite extraordinary.
Steffie makes the basic point that many women are not attracted to a
discourse where a goal of the discussion is to dominate the other with your
ideas:
"An interesting commentary in light of the current discussion on why
women don't participate very much on political discussion lists.
Another part of it, I believe, is the competitive, dominating dynamic>on
many listserves."
This is a well known general feature of the difference in styles of
communication between men and women. Of course as with any generalization
there are many exceptions. There could be a long discussion of where this
came from (genetics, politics, economics, culture etc.).
Louis responds:
"But I will not allow charges that this is some kind of cyber-version of
American Psycho to go unchallenged. I have too much self-respect." He then
makes further threats about shutting down Marxmail.
For making a statement about women being aversive to competition and
dominance Steffie receives an attack, an assertion of power and dominance
and a degradation !!
Louis has proven Steffie's point with crystal clarity.
John Olmsted
The discussion between Steffi and Louise is quite extraordinary.
Steffi makes the basic point that many women are not attracted to discourse
where a goal of the discussion is to domiate the other with your ideas:
An interesting commentary in light of the current discussion on why
women don't participate very much on political discussion lists.
Another part of it, I believe, is the competitive, dominating dynamic
on many listserves.
This is a well known general feature of the differences in styles of
communication between men and women. Of course as with any generalization
there are many exceptions. There could be a long discussion of where this
came from (genetics, politics, economics, culture etc.).
What is extradinary here is how Louis response demonstrates so clearly the
validity of what Steffi wrote.
Who was it who wrote about how the negation, the denial proves the point>
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] Meeting of 20 organizations in Argentina: ¿Unity of the left? ,
Carlos Petroni Sat 03 Jun 2006, 10:34 GMT
- [Marxism] p.s. Re: Female Pundits Could Use Help With Hate Mail,
Steffie Brooks Sat 03 Jun 2006, 07:11 GMT
- [Marxism] Sexist Language - briefly fron me,
Tom O'Lincoln Sat 03 Jun 2006, 04:36 GMT
- [Marxism] Ohio Republicans and fairness of elections,
Mark Lause Sat 03 Jun 2006, 01:44 GMT
- RE: [Marxism] Female Pundits Could Use Help With Hate Mail/ from John Olmsted,
John Olmsted Sat 03 Jun 2006, 00:51 GMT
- [Marxism] Female Pundits Could Use Help With Hate Mail,
Steffie Brooks Fri 02 Jun 2006, 22:14 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]