Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[Marxism] Indict, Impeach and Prosecute Bush (and Cheney) Now!



Senate Hearings on Bush, Now
By Carl Bernstein
Vanity Fair

http://www.vanityfair.com/features/general/articles/060417fege08

Monday 17 April 2006

In this VF.com exclusive, a Watergate veteran and Vanity Fair contributor
calls for bipartisan hearings investigating the Bush presidency. Should
Republicans on the Hill take the high road and save themselves come November?

Worse than Watergate? High crimes and misdemeanors justifying the
impeachment of George W. Bush, as increasing numbers of Democrats in Washington
hope, and, sotto voce, increasing numbers of Republicans - including some of
the president's top lieutenants - now fear? Leaders of both parties are acutely
aware of the vehemence of anti-Bush sentiment in the country, expressed
especially in the increasing number of Americans - nearing fifty percent in
some polls - who say they would favor impeachment if the president were proved
to have deliberately lied to justify going to war in Iraq.

John Dean, the Watergate conspirator who ultimately shattered the Watergate
conspiracy, rendered his precipitous (or perhaps prescient) impeachment verdict
on Bush two years ago in the affirmative, without so much as a question mark in
choosing the title of his book Worse than Watergate. On March 31, some three
decades after he testified at the seminal hearings of the Senate Watergate
Committee, Dean reiterated his dark view of Bush's presidency in a
congressional hearing that shed more noise than light, and more partisan rancor
than genuine inquiry. The ostensible subject: whether Bush should be censured
for unconstitutional conduct in ordering electronic surveillance of Americans
without a warrant.

Raising the worse-than-Watergate question and demanding unequivocally that
Congress seek to answer it is, in fact, overdue and more than justified by
ample evidence stacked up from Baghdad back to New Orleans and, of increasing
relevance, inside a special prosecutor's office in downtown Washington.

In terms of imminent, meaningful action by the Congress, however, the
question of whether the president should be impeached (or, less severely,
censured) remains premature. More important, it is essential that the Senate
vote - hopefully before the November elections, and with overwhelming support
from both parties - to undertake a full investigation of the conduct of the
presidency of George W. Bush, along the lines of the Senate Watergate
Committee's investigation during the presidency of Richard M. Nixon.

How much evidence is there to justify such action?


http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/printer_041806Z.shtml

. . . . . .

from

"...the shores of Gitche Gumee,
by the shining Big-Sea water..."

gitcheegumee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]