Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: [Marxism] Venezuela and Open Source



Louis Proyect wrote:
http://english-cyprus.indymedia.org/newswire/display/92/index.php

From Venezuela to Cyprus - Self-sufficiency, Free software and the
Revolution

The revolutionary process unfolding in Venezuela has taken on new
dimensions, rendering the anti-imperialist concept of economic and
technological self-sufficiency directly relevant to the electronic and
digital realities of the 21st century.

Richard Stallman, one of the biggest names in, and coiner of the term,
the free software movement, supports the idea of "copyleft," a "reverse"
copyright. Instead of limiting what you can do with the software as is
the goal of normal copyright, copyleft deprives no person of the power
to use the products of the free software movement in any way they wish;
all that it does is to deprive them of the power to take away the same
freedom from others by means of such freedom.

[I could continue on like this. "It has been objected that upon the
abolition of proprietary software all work will cease, and universal
laziness will overtake developers."]

In the West hundreds of networks of Anarchists, Anarcho-Communists,
Feminist and Ecology- minded Socialists have been operating facilities
of the Liberation Movement, organizational tools and community
communications, educational, creative and entertainment services all
based on open- source free software.

I'm rather familiar with the free software movement, and I've never
heard of this "Liberation Movement."

This kind of software is often referred to by several names with
overlapping meanings. The names emphasize various aspects of what "Free"
means: Open Source; Free, Non-proprietary, etc. "Free" in these frames
of reference does not refer only to their price (which very often is
zero). More important than price, "Free" refers to free from Corporate
ownership.

The classic example is free "as in free speech" versus free "as in free
beer." In other languages, they have separate words for the two meaning.
In French, as I understand it, the words are libre and gratis respectively.

The term "open source" has the problem that it only technically means
exactly what it means: the source is available for viewing. This is far
from "free," as explained above.


-Jeff

PS Check out this. :)
http://fs4.deviantart.com/i/2004/270/7/7/Tux_n___Che_v1_0_by_nano_online.png


--
be-
bop
the beat
stops
and changes
over and over again
--
Join the ARMY (the nation's MOST POPULAR murder/suicide cult)!

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]