Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[Marxism] Reliability of Data





The note below, came from another list I subscribe to... Question: Why is it
that we (leftists) tend to rely on World Bank and Economist data. Are there any
Marxis sources for reliable data? Is it because most of us tend to be
post-positivist that we do not focus on quantitative data? Are the World Bank
and The Economist (among other establishment/capitalist sources) reliable? Why
are they more reliable than others?

STARTS:
I have always found the World Bank's Annual Reports a treasure house of
statistics, though you could probably find documentation in other
places like the Review of African Political Economy. I also often find
the Economist useful for data. I often do not agree with them, but
their reporting is excellent.

The best effort to put the economic issues of the crisis in terms
understandable by layman and undergraduates is a talk Gerry Helleiner
did about four or five years ago, which was published in the Canadian
Journal of African Studies in about 2003.

While I do not make excuses for irresponsable African leaders, I think
that the crucial variable was the very high interest rates of the early
Reagan years. Reagan wanted to cut taxes and control inflation at the
same time. African countries that had to renegotiate debts found
interest rates had doubled or tripled. Even countries that had tried to
avoid the debt trap, like Tanzania, were caught in it.

ENDS



________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]