Re: [Marxism] Partisanship and Objectivity in Theoretical Work

[Jim Farmelant <farmelantj@xxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:24:09 -0600 "Austin, Andrew" <austina@xxxxxxxx>
writes:
> This is why I said we don't much disagree in substance.  I just think
> that we ought to use the term ideology to mean a systematically
> distorted reflection of the world that functions to justify a given
> state of affairs.  Andrew

I would second that, although, as Carrol points out, the other
uses of the term, ideology, still crop up, even in discussions
among serious Marxists.


>
> ________________________________
>
> From: marxism-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Carrol Cox
> Sent: Fri 3/17/2006 8:21 AM
> To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition
> Subject: Re: [Marxism] Partisanship and Objectivity in Theoretical
> Work
>
> If you want to argue with each other, argue about the world, not
> about words.
>
>


________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism