Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Partisanship and Objectivity in Theoretical Work
Austin, Andrew
Charles, My problem with this line of thinking is that it systematically
confuses objectivity with neutrality. One can take sides and be
objective.
^^^
CB: I'm not clear on what line of thinking you are referring to. Cornforth
takes the same position that you do: One can take sides and be objective. In
fact, Cornforth's position is that one _must_ take sides to be objective.
So, I assume you mean the line of thinking that Cornforth is criticizing
"systematically confuses objectivity with neutrality ?
^^^^^^
Neutrality, in contrast, is ideology. Instead of yielding
objectivity, neutrality hides distortions of knowledge. The ideologue
distorts theory to bring about or deny a process or outcome. The scientist
employs theory for many purposes, but does so in an objective fashion. Too
many so-called scientists are of course ideologues. But that is not what
science should be (and ought concerns do not make one an ideologue). I
don't believe that the meaning of the term ideology has changed among
Marxists.
^^^
CB: Well, Cornforth is a Marxist , and he is using it differently than Marx
and Engels used it in _The German Ideology_, for example.
^^^^^
Putting all this another way, if one means
by ideology "interested knowledge" then I understand the argument, but
believe that is to misuse the term ideology, at least as I understand
Marxists to use it. I consider myself to be a partisan and a scientist.
I do not consider myself to be an ideologue. Nor do I consider my work
to be ideological. Others may disagree, of course. Andrew
^^^^
CB: I have no problem with your retaining the classical usage for
"ideology". I think that Cornforth's usage clearly is intended to be
different than that classical usage. With that in mind, his whole essay is
very good stuff. His important point is that a scientific work must be
partisan to be objective, the opposite of the standard bourgeois idea on
this.
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] Partisanship and Objectivity in Theoretical Work, (continued)
- RE: [Marxism] Partisanship and Objectivity in Theoretical Work,
Austin, Andrew Thu 16 Mar 2006, 21:01 GMT
- [Marxism] Partisanship and Objectivity in Theoretical Work,
Charles Brown Thu 16 Mar 2006, 21:26 GMT
- RE: [Marxism] Partisanship and Objectivity in Theoretical Work,
Austin, Andrew Thu 16 Mar 2006, 21:50 GMT
- [Marxism] Partisanship and Objectivity in Theoretical Work,
Charles Brown Fri 17 Mar 2006, 13:30 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Partisanship and Objectivity in Theoretical Work,
Jim Farmelant Fri 17 Mar 2006, 14:58 GMT
- [Marxism] Partisanship and Objectivity in Theoretical Work,
Charles Brown Fri 17 Mar 2006, 18:11 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]