RE: [Marxism] Surplus-value model of class

["Austin, Andrew" <austina@xxxxxxxx>]

Such reductionism is inconsistent with historical materialist conceptions of 
productive modalities.  I am still waiting to see proponents of this model 
generate a viable class analytic.  Hell, I prefer Wright's approach over 
Resnick-Wolff.  Andrew

________________________________

From: marxism-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of clintonf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wed 3/15/2006 11:34 PM
To: marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Marxism] Surplus-value model of class



Very interesting. This sounds like the "surplus value" model of class favoured 
by Resnick and Wolff of the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

http://www.umass.edu/resnick-wolff/

CF


<Subject: Re: [Marxism] What kind of socialism are we talking about here?
From: Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:38:40 -0500

What is of
interest to socialists is how oil or copper profits are used, not that the
state owns the mines, wells, etc.
>


________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism


________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism