Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Rachel's Words Initiative
- To: "marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Marxism] Rachel's Words Initiative
- From: Andrew Pollack <acpollack2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 07:43:59 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=DjjQA0/11dhDateh42vkKZckB/CxCStYVqAC27oZ+noABMumfQKvH0yrG59WTbke0gRfs038Zr21Idb8kZyFb2iMvlnfHc41fio74nnkGxg6Hfe4+hWaCI8y59rEjd03eAcUBzHsfDATOG5em1M2xK0xITOSUuHGd7GS4QBZnlQ= ;
When the story Walter refers to came out in the NY Times groups started
discussing a response. Below is what seems to be the one consensus has
developed on. For those who haven't heard about all this before, the key is
that the director of the theater workshop solicited the opinion of NY Zionists
as to whether it was OK to do the play, and cancelled it when they told him
no it wasn't OK.
Hi Everyone: We've been working all day on this, and getting feedback and
permissions from many people. We're still developing it, but want to be
inclusive,
and realize that if we wait for all the details to be worked out it'll be
too late, so
we're sending it out now, however imperfect. We'd like to engage everyone
in the
dialogue. We see the issue of censoring Rachel's play as a huge mobilizing
opportunity, and through Rachel's words we hope to break through the media
silence we've all been struggling against. We in no way want to override
other
people's initiatives, but we'd like to attempt a unified and therefore
hugely visible
event. Please forward this any groups you think will be interested.
WHY ARE PEOPLE AFRAID OF RACHEL CORRIE?S WORDS?
And how can we work together to ensure they are heard even more widely?
THE BACKGROUND: The play "My Name is Rachel Corrie" was scheduled to
open in New York on March 22nd. It has been "postponed" indefinitely.
In the
New York Times article on February 28, James C. Nicola, the artistic
director of
the New York Theatre
Workshop (NYTW) which was hosting the play, said he decided to postpone the
show after polling local Jewish religious and community leaders as to their
feelings about the work. In the Guardian, the play's director Alan
Rickman
denounced the decision as "censorship", stating "Rachel Corrie lived in
nobody's
pocket but her own. Whether one is sympathetic with her or not, her voice
is like
a clarion in the fog and should be heard." James Nicola stated "I don't
think we
were worried about the audience, I think we were more worried that those
who
had never encountered her writing, never encountered the piece, would be
using
this as an opportunity to position their arguments." Strange that he
should be
worried about people who have never encountered her writing, and so removes
the opportunity to let people encounter her writing and decide for
themselves.
Rachel's mother Cindy wonders, ?Why are people so afraid of Rachel's words??
We ask the same question and are determined to give people the opportunity
to
hear those words.
THE COALITION: We are coordinating a broad-based coalition
of peace and justice groups, human rights groups, theatre groups, civil
rights
groups, and others to respond to this censorship of Rachel?s words with a
strong
and unified approach. March 16, the third anniversary of Rachel?s death,
is a
compelling date on which to do this. We are looking at a multi-pronged
approach, encompassing both AN EVENT and A WORLD-WIDE ACTION.
THE
EVENT: A staged theatrical reading in New York City on March 16 of ?My Name
is Rachel Corrie?. We are inviting Megan Dodds and Alan Rickman, the actor
and director of the Royal Court production to do the reading, but because
they
are mounting the show now at a theatre in London, it is unlikely that they
will be
able to come. In that case, we are working on finding high-profile actors
in New
York to do a reading of the play. If rights are not granted for the play
itself, a
highly publicized staged theatrical reading of Rachel?s e-mails and
writings can
still take place. The NYTW claimed, among other reasons, that they didn?t
have
enough time to put on the show. Let?s prove them wrong. We are doing
outreach
so this event can be staged in multiple cities nationally and world-wide if
the
correct permissions are granted.
THE WORLD-WIDE ACTION: Over a 24-hour
period throughout March 16, activists in cities world-wide in a public space
reading (with or without a loud-speaker or microphone) Rachel?s e-mails and
journal entries. Fliers can be distributed to passers-by encouraging them
to ask
the question for themselves: Why are people so frightened of Rachel
Corrie?s
words?
WHAT WE ARE ASKING: Please endorse this initiative, and join this
coalition. It?s not meant to replace any plans that groups may already have
for
March 16th or individual responses to the cancellation of the play
(expressing
feelings to the NYTW, writing op-eds, etc.) but to support them. In fact,
we are
hoping that a unified action, world-wide, and with press coverage will
ensure that
Rachel?s words are heard more widely than ever and, through her words, her
message of human rights and justice will be heard as well. If you already
have an
event planned for March 16, perhaps reading from Rachel?s e-mails can be
incorporated into or before/after your event.
WHAT HAS BEEN DONE: ? We are
in direct contact with Cindy and Craig Corrie (Rachel?s parents) and are
proceeding with their support and permission on all aspects of this
event/action.
? We have sent a proposal to the Royal Court Theatre in London about the
rights
to the show. We will update you when we receive their response. ? We are
approaching progressive theatre groups like THAW (Theaters Against War),
with
the hopes of developing contacts in the New York theatre community who can
help pull this off. ? We have spoken to people from multiple groups and
media
outlets to get an initial feel about this action/event. People are
enthused. We are
all outraged by what has happened. But we have the opportunity to harness
our
energy toward a very positive end. We are setting up a ?Rachel?s Words?
listserve and website to help facilitate joint communication. We will send
regular
updates as to which groups and individuals are signing onto this joint
coalition
and progress in the action/event. Please let us know if you want to be a
part of
this coordinated response. Looking forward to working together in
solidarity, Ann
Petter and Jen Marlowe Please contact us at: rachels_words@xxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] Economist Article: "The health of companies and the wealth of economies no longer go togethe." 2/25/06,
John A Imani Thu 02 Mar 2006, 18:35 GMT
- [Marxism] The Meaning of Rachel Corrie Of Dignity and Solidarity By EDWARD SAID,
Mehmet Cagatay Thu 02 Mar 2006, 18:31 GMT
- [Marxism] NY producer sucks up to Zionists over Corrie play,
Andrew Pollack Thu 02 Mar 2006, 18:09 GMT
- [Marxism] Norman Finkelstein answers hatchet job,
Louis Proyect Thu 02 Mar 2006, 17:03 GMT
- [Marxism] Rachel's Words Initiative,
Andrew Pollack Thu 02 Mar 2006, 15:45 GMT
- [Marxism] Abuse of Latino Forest Workers,
Brian Shannon Thu 02 Mar 2006, 15:26 GMT
- [Marxism] Rachel Corrie: The Beautiful Face of the United States,
Walter Lippmann Thu 02 Mar 2006, 14:55 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]