[Marxism] Hillary Clinton saber-rattling

[Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>]

NY Times, January 19, 2006
Hillary Clinton Says White House Has Mishandled Iran
By JOHN O'NEIL

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton last night criticized the Bush
administration for its response to Iran's nuclear program, saying it had
chosen to "downplay" the crisis over the past several years.

In a speech at Princeton University, Mrs. Clinton, a New York Democrat,
joined the Bush administration's call for sanctions against Iran, and also
said that the threat of military action against nuclear sites should not be
ruled out.

But she was critical of the administration for letting European nations
take the lead in negotiations over the last several years.

"I believe that we lost critical time in dealing with Iran because the
White House chose to downplay the threats and to outsource the
negotiations," Ms. Clinton said, according to a transcript of the speech
published by The Daily Princetonian. "I don't believe you face threats like
Iran or North Korea by outsourcing it to others and standing on the sidelines."

Since 2002 Britain, France and Germany have led talks meant to assure that
Tehran's nuclear program would not give it the capacity to build weapons.
The three countries last week declared that Iran's decision to resume
nuclear research had brought the talks to an end, and, with the United
States in support, asked that the matter be sent to the United Nations
Security Council for possible action.

The Bush administration has long favored sanctions, but had deferred action
at the request of the European nations, who convinced Iran in 2003 to
suspend its nuclear program. Mr. Bush last week said that he would pursue a
vigorous diplomatic push to get as many countries as possible on board for
possible United Nations action. On North Korea, the Bush administration has
refused that nation's request for direct talks over its nuclear program and
instead has worked in concert with China, South Korea, Russia and Japan.

Iran today continued to give mixed signals in reaction to the push for a
United Nations referral. Its oil minister, Davoud Danesh-Jafari, told the
official Iranian news agency that "in case of sanctions, other countries
will suffer as well as Iran."

"One of the consequences will be the unleashing of a crisis in the oil
sector and particularly a price hike," he said, according to Reuters.

At the same time, Iran's top nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani, told the BBC
that his country wanted a compromise and hoped to resume the European talks.

"They should not ask a brave nation with very good scientists not to engage
in nuclear research," he said. "If they want guarantees of no diversion of
nuclear fuel we can reach a formula acceptable to both sides."

The United States and Europe have made clear that they will not accept any
program that includes research that would give Tehran the know-how to
develop weapons.

In her Princeton speech, Ms. Clinton spoke of the gravity of Iran's program
in terms similar to those used by the Administration.

"Let's be clear about the threat we face," Ms. Clinton said. "A nuclear
Iran is a danger to Israel, to its neighbors and beyond."

"We cannot and should not - must not - permit Iran to build or acquire
nuclear weapons," she said. "In order to prevent that from occurring, we
must have more support vigorously and publicly expressed by China and
Russia, and we must move as quickly as feasible for sanctions in the United
Nations."

The United States and the European nations have called for an emergency
meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency on Feb. 2, and have begun
circulating a draft resolution that would refer Iran to the Security Council.

Russia and China have both expressed opposition to sanctions, at least at
this point, and are reluctant even to support a Security Council referral.
The United States and the European nations have sought to reassure Russia
and China that, for now, referral to the Security Council will not
necessarily lead to sanctions.

Last week, Senator Evan Bayh, an Indiana Democrat, said that the Bush
administration was correct in not ruling out possible military action to
block an Iranian nuclear weapons program, but stressed that force should
only be used after every other measure had been exhausted.

In general, Democrats have been supportive of the administration decision
to take a back seat to the Europeans in negotiations, and many have
expressed alarm whenever the conservative Republicans engaged in a more
aggressive posture toward Iran.

Ms. Clinton's speech last night laid out a markedly tougher approach. She
has already been under fire from many liberal activists in the Democratic
party for her support of the war in Iraq and refusal to call for an
immediate American pullout.

Iraq also figured in Ms. Clinton's speech, as she so drew a link between
the Iranian conflict and events there. Shiite parties with close links to
Iran appear to have been the biggest winners in last month's Iraqi
elections, whose final results are to be released soon.

"Part of the problem that we confront with Iran today is, of course, its
involvement in and influence over Iraq," she said.

Ms. Clinton said she was against an immediate military pullout, but said
the American military commitment should not be "open ended."

"If last December's elections lead to a successful Iraqi government, that
should allow us to start drawing down our troops during this year while
leaving behind a smaller contingent in safe areas with greater intelligence
and quick-strike capabilities," she said.

"That will help us stabilize the new Iraqi government," Ms. Clinton said.
"It will send a message to Iran that they do not have a free hand in Iraq
despite their considerable influence and personal and religious connections
there."

--

www.marxmail.org


________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism