Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Re: Nuclear power
On Jan 13, 2006, at 7:23 PM, Tom O'Lincoln wrote:
David W writes:
"The fact is that historically the main reason for opposing nukes was
chance of a meltdown. That 'chance' has now been so far reduced, "
In Australia the issues were and are posed differently. There are no
nuclear power plants here, and I suspect it's because of the
strength of
the anti-nuclear movement in the late seventies, when railways
unionists
refused to transport sulfur to the Mary Kathleen mine, maritime
workers
took strike action in support of anti-nuclear demonstrators, metal
shops
refused to work on equipment for uranium mines, and the Australian
Council of Trade Union passed resolutions calling on unions to oppose
uranium mining generally.
The argument here centres on uranium mining, which is still
restricted,
again because of the earlier campaigns. The nuclear industry, seeing a
likely increase in demand, is now trying to get rid of those
restrictions. They're also arguing the merits of nuclear power, but I
don't think they seriously expect to build power stations here (the
Australian public is aware enough to immediately ask where the waste
would go) -- it's more about legitimising export of uranium to be used
elsewhere.
Because it's about mining, there is an important link between
anti-nuclear campaigning and Aboriginal land rights. Mining companies
are some of the worst enemies of our indigenous people. So frankly I
think it very unlikely David will convince any Australian leftists to
change their anti-nuclear views.
Aren't these safety issue superseded by the nuclear waste/safety
issue? If society is unable to keep the oceans clean and save the
natural world, including its diverse plants and wildlife, including
the rich products of the oceans, how can we even begin to think of
further development of nuclear power?
We should oppose any development along these lines. The planet is our
single resource. From the capitalists we get promises, promises,
promises. Their inability to clean up their act is an important lever
for us to use in urging the replacement of the capitalist/waste/
impoverishment system.
Brian Shannon
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] Re: Nuclear Power, again..., (continued)
- [Marxism] Re: Nuclear Power,
Emerson Tung Fri 13 Jan 2006, 00:35 GMT
- [Marxism] great song--Compared to What?,
Linda Jansen Thu 12 Jan 2006, 23:25 GMT
- [Marxism] A socialist prayer to God Almighty, wherever he is now,
Nestor Gorojovsky Thu 12 Jan 2006, 21:48 GMT
- [Marxism] Magdoff essay,
Debordagoria Thu 12 Jan 2006, 21:37 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]