Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Bolivia and Brazil
Calculated Contradictions
Evo Morales's two constituencies: Bolivia... and Brazil
By Mac Margolis
Newsweek International
Jan. 16, 2006 issue - When a mop-haired socialist coca farmer won the
Bolivian presidency last month, a chill swept through Washington. After
all, Evo Morales is not only the champion of the cocaleros, whose harvests
supply the global cocaine trade, but bosom amigo to both Fidel Castro and
Hugo Chavez, the United States' top two headaches in the hemisphere. Now,
with yet another Latin American nation apparently set to take a hard left,
the wonks and moguls were bracing for the fallout?not inside the
Washington, D.C., Beltway, but in Brazil.
No country has more at stake in the "new Bolivia" than its giant neighbor.
With its volatile politics and blighted economy, Bolivia might seem like
forbidden territory. Not to the Brazilians. They know that this Andean
nation sits atop 1.6 trillion cubic meters of natural gas, enough to fuel
South America for decades. When the Bolivian economy opened up in the
mid-'90s, state-owned Brazilian oil giant Petrobras built an epic pipeline
to pump natural gas from the Bolivian jungle to So Paulo and plowed an
additional $1.5 billion into oil and gas prospecting, refining and
distribution. Bolivia now supplies half of Brazil's natural gas.
Brazilians, in turn, buy a third of Bolivian exports, pay a fifth of La
Paz's taxes and process about 40 percent of its soybeans.
Now that mutual bounty could be in jeopardy. Morales built his campaign on
promises to nationalize natural resources and "decolonize" the economy,
code words for rolling back the rules of gringo-sponsored capitalism. "In
the case of Bolivia," says Jean-Paul Prates, an independent Brazilian
oil-industry analyst, "we are the gringos."
Officially, relations between the Brazilian government and Bolivia's heir
apparent, who takes office Jan. 22, couldn't be cozier. Even when he held a
thin lead in the polls, Morales made a point of seeking the blessings of
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, whom he admiringly calls "my
big brother." Lula, in turn, issued an effusive note hailing Morales's
electoral victory and quickly dispatched a special envoy to La Paz to
reinforce Brasilia's good will.
But not even Lula can divine what a Morales government will do. On the
campaign trail, garlanded in flowers and coca leaves, the fiery cocalero
repeatedly denounced foreign companies for "looting" the country. Recently
he reiterated his promise to make multinational companies renegotiate their
contracts, a prospect that will surely inflict losses on the oil industry,
Petrobras included. (Total foreign investment in Bolivia plunged to just
$62 million in the first half of 2005, down from a peak of $600 million in
1998.) Yet he recently drew applause in an unlikely gathering of business
and civic leaders in Santa Cruz de la Sierra, a wealthy province where
Morales is seen with skepticism. "I do not want to expropriate or
confiscate any assets," Morales said. "I want to learn from the businessmen."
Part of the ambiguity might be calculated. Morales was swept to power by
one of Latin America's most volatile constituencies, a loose coalition of
urban nationalists, coca growers and impoverished Indians who toppled two
constitutional governments in as many years. But he knows that insurgents
alone will not put Bolivia's stunned economy back on its feet. That means
playing the risky game of both ends against the middle. "Morales has to
deliver results, which means offering investors reasonable terms," says
Michael Shifter, a senior analyst at the Inter-American Dialogue, an
independent Washington think tank. "Yet if he abandons his [radical]
discourse, his voter base will feel betrayed and go to the streets, and
maybe force him out, too."
Still, many analysts believe that good sense will prevail, if for no other
reason than that Morales has little choice. Unlike Chavez, who is swimming
in oil, Morales still has most of his energy windfall buried underground.
To get at it, "Bolivia needs foreign capital far more than the world needs
Bolivia's gas," says Ricardo Amorim, Latin American analyst for WestLB
Bank. That may not be the message that Bolivia's restive majority is eager
to hear. But it is one that its new leader can ill afford to ignore.
© 2006 Newsweek, Inc.
© 2006 MSNBC.com
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10756777/site/newsweek/
--
www.marxmail.org
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] Toronto: Radicals At Work, Discussion Circle,
Tony Tracy Wed 11 Jan 2006, 18:54 GMT
- [Marxism] FW: Articles on Quebec and Canada's federal election,
Richard Fidler Wed 11 Jan 2006, 18:46 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] NYTimes.com: In the Treatment of Diabetes, Success Often Does Not Pay,
acpollack2@xxxxxxxx Wed 11 Jan 2006, 16:22 GMT
- [Marxism] More Cindy Sheehan,
David McDonald Wed 11 Jan 2006, 15:59 GMT
- [Marxism] Bolivia and Brazil,
Louis Proyect Wed 11 Jan 2006, 15:42 GMT
- [Marxism] Evo Morales and the Propaganda machine,
Fernando Torres Wed 11 Jan 2006, 15:31 GMT
- [Marxism] Lenin, Trotsky and Permanent Revolution,
Charles Brown Wed 11 Jan 2006, 15:10 GMT
- [Marxism] Double standard,
Louis Proyect Wed 11 Jan 2006, 13:51 GMT
- [Marxism] U.S. Wealth stat: Inherited vs "Earned",
Debordagoria Wed 11 Jan 2006, 13:26 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]