Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[Marxism] Rightist journalist: Saddam show trial "has put new regime on trial" (Krauthammer thinks he should have been murdered)



Man for a Glass Booth


By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, December 9, 2005; A31




Of all the mistakes that the Bush administration has committed in Iraq,
none is as gratuitous and self-inflicted as the bungling of the trial of
Saddam Hussein.

Although Hussein deserves to be shot like a dog -- or, same thing, like
the Ceausescus -- we nonetheless decided to give him a trial. First, to
demonstrate the moral superiority of the new Iraq as it struggles to
live by the rule of law. Second, and even more important, to bear
witness.

War crimes trials are, above all and always, for educational purposes.
This one was for the world to see and experience and recoil from the
catalogue of Hussein's crimes, and to demonstrate the justice of a war
that stripped this man and his gang of their monstrous and murderous
power.

It has not worked out that way. Instead of Hussein's crimes being on
trial, he has succeeded in putting the new regime on trial. The lead
story of every court session has been his demeanor, his defiance, his
imperiousness. The evidence brought against him by his hapless victims
-- testimony mangled in translation and electronic voice alteration --
made the back pages at best.

"This has become a platform for Saddam to show himself as a caged lion
when really he was a mouse in a hole," said Vice President Ghazi Yawar.
"I don't know who is the genius who is producing this farce. It's a
political process. It's a comedy show."

There hasn't been such judicial incompetence since Judge Ito and the
O.J. trial. We can excuse the Iraqis, who are new to all this and
justifiably terrified of retribution. But there is no excusing the Bush
administration, which had Hussein in custody for two years and had even
longer to think about putting on a trial that would not become a star
turn for a defeated enemy.

Why have we given him control of the stage? We all remember the picture
of him pulled out of his spider hole. That should be the Saddam Hussein
we put on trial. Instead, with every appearance, he dresses more
regally, emerging from cowering captive to ordinary prisoner to dictator
on temporary leave. Now he carries on as legitimate and imperious head
of state. He plays the benign father of his country, calling the judge
"son," then threatens the judge's life. Hussein shouts, defies,
brandishes a Koran. The judge keeps telling him he's out of order. He
disobeys with impunity, the guards not daring to intervene.

What kind of message does that send to Iraqis who have been endlessly
told that Hussein and his regime were finished? "The performance has
heartened his followers," writes The Post's Doug Struck from Baghdad.
"In Tikrit . . . a large crowd of demonstrators chanted their loyalty on
Tuesday. Several marchers said they were emboldened by his courtroom
bravado."

This is absurd. If anything, Hussein should be brought in wearing prison
garb, perhaps in shackles, just for effect. And why was he given control
of the script? He shouts, interrupts and does his Mussolini histrionics
unmolested. Instead of the press being behind a glass wall, it is
Hussein who should be. Better still, placed in a glass booth, like
Eichmann, like some isolated specimen of deranged humanity, symbolically
and physically cut off from the world of normal human values.

Instead, he struts. And we are witness to a political test of wills
between the new Iraq represented by an as-yet incompetent judicial
system and the would-be tyrant-for-life defiantly raising once again the
banner of Baathism, on a worldwide stage afforded him by us .

Until now the Baathists who constitute the bulk of this Sunni insurgency
had no symbolic presence, no political platform, no visible leadership.
We have now given that to them, gratis.

Both President Bush and his opponents in Congress are incessantly
talking about "benchmarks" to guide any U.S. withdrawals from Iraq. But
there is one benchmark that is always left unspoken: We cannot leave
until Saddam Hussein is dead, executed for his crimes. No one will say
it, but everyone knows it. As long as he is alive and well-dressed,
every Iraqi will have to wonder what will happen to him and his family
if Hussein returns. Only Hussein's death will assure them that he will
not return.

Which is why the lateness of this trial is such a tragedy. And why its
bungling is such a danger. Our only hope, as always with Hussein, is
that he destroys himself with his arrogance and stupidity. He has
stupidly walked out of his own trial. This is our opportunity. He should
not be allowed back, certainly not without a glass booth. Only Saddam
Hussein can save us from our own incompetence. We should let him.

letters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]