Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] re: raunch culture
- To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Marxism] re: raunch culture
- From: Debordagoria <phantasmagorias@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:43:34 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Jd3H1HH+WXbEM/otvGa5LWnViskZ31J9+avYu1EU/hmUJzaG/3UO5/YGNW2dkDlzLM32Dbzi7HPUyWE3YwNurcq6pNqL3n80MjE6O1QR1BJAYRZSjLRB8RKK+Gt4/sGHjgUkMxu2dC0udKRnk28WroDtOyVFkCE12Q3smsm+Vl4= ;
Katha Pollitt writes eloquently about these issues,
such as in this recent column.
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20051128/pollitt
--- "M. Junaid Alam" <alam1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "I tried to get with the programme, but I could
> never make the argument
> add up in my head. How is resurrecting every
> stereotype of female
> sexuality that feminism endeavoured to banish good
> for women? Why is
> labouring to look like Paris Hilton empowering? And
> how is imitating a
> stripper or a porn star - a woman whose job is to
> imitate arousal in the
> first place - going to render us sexually
> liberated?"
>
> That's what I've been wondering since I started
> thinking about the topic
> a couple years ago. On the one hand you can say
> that, because female
> sexual liberation is extremely new and even
> revolutionary from a
> historical viewpoint, maybe there will be a period
> of "overreaction" in
> which an overt and blatant flaunting of sexuality is
> necessary,
> cathartic. It's also possible that the hyper-sexual
> commercialized twist
> on feminism is a real-life analogy to what Marx said
> would happen in
> socialist society, that it would be almost subsumed
> by the flaws of
> capitalist society when it first emerges (maybe
> "birth pangs" was the
> term?)
>
> But on the other hand, when Levy talks about the
> female fascination
> with being strippers, running around eager to excite
> male viewers on
> 'Girls Gone Wild', with women themselves calling the
> shots to increase
> this trend, perhaps this reflects the the perversion
> of feminist values,
> which originally had a more radical flavor, that is
> inevitable under a
> capitalist paradigm. Maybe this is the natural
> direction of feminist
> values under capitalism, to become a joke on itself.
>
> I think this question of culture and women and
> social values is
> important. I think the left is way too careless and
> carefree when it
> comes to looking at what it means.
CLIP
__________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] Where they hide the cash,
Sudhir Devadas Mon 05 Dec 2005, 08:28 GMT
- [Marxism] gm animals for research,
Sudhir Devadas Mon 05 Dec 2005, 08:18 GMT
- [Marxism] re: raunch culture,
M. Junaid Alam Mon 05 Dec 2005, 08:15 GMT
- [Marxism] judgement on blairite legacy,
Sudhir Devadas Mon 05 Dec 2005, 08:15 GMT
- [Marxism] Head Off Fiasco at NYU,
Michael Hoover Mon 05 Dec 2005, 08:08 GMT
- [Marxism] The Abu Ali Torture case -- an earlier paradigm,
Brian Shannon Mon 05 Dec 2005, 08:08 GMT
- [Marxism] Petition in Support of NYU TAs,
Michael Hoover Mon 05 Dec 2005, 08:08 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]