Re: [Marxism] Science and Pseudoscience

["rrubinelli" <rrubinelli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I thought the point was the social content of the Russian revolution,
its interruption, and final overthrow; whether or not state capitalism
was an accurate description and analysis of the organization of labor
and property, of classes in that struggle, and not, per se,
epistemological concerns about the nature of knowledge, science and
probabilities.

rr
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Lause" <MLause@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 7:12 PM
Subject: [Marxism] Science and Pseudoscience


> Let's get back to the point..
>
> As an example of how social sciences are really like hard sciences, we
> have meteorology on the table alongside economics.
>
> I'm waiting to see some dissection of these disciplines.  In
particular,
> I'm interested in knowing about the differences
>
> ML
>
> ________________________________________________
> YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
> Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism


________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism