Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] If Marxism is a Science...
- To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Marxism] If Marxism is a Science...
- From: Einde O'Callaghan <einde@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 16:23:18 +0100
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
Louis R Godena wrote:
[T]he definitive defeat of the Russian working class wasn't in
1989-1991 but 60 years earlier...
This is why the working class didn't come to teh defence of the
regime, because the regime was just another bunch of exploiters.... I
don't think you can provide me with one example where teh working
class,or even a section of teh working class, went into struggle to
defend the existing political system or the associated organisation of
the economy. The workers didn't feel it was their state and sat on
their hands.
If this is true, why didn't the Russian working class rise in defence of
"their" state in the 1920s? And if the working class didn't care about
"their" state back then, how do you explain the ferocious resistance to
the German invasion? Most reputable studies I've seen (Fitzpatrick,
Getty, Thurston, Siegelbaum) posit a fair amount of popular for Stalin
during the 1930s. Did such support exclude that of workers? A picture
*can* be credibly drawn of Russian workers as victims of corrupted
power, drilled into passivity, but it seems to me that these and other
seeming contradictions have to be addressed first.
This is one of the questions that Kevin Murphy's book is attempting to
address. But, briefly and rather crudely, one factor is that the working
class of 1917 had ceased to exist as a self-conscious class by 1920/21 -
even Lenin admitted as much and the party was ruling in the name of a
barely existent or even non-existent class - substitutionism on a grand
scale. The new working class that emerged during NEP was ultimately
unable to reimpose its control over the party and particularly over the
state bureaucracy. There is nothing particularly controversial about
this - at least among those from a Trotskyist background - since this is
basically what the Left Opposition said during the period before its
defeat in 1927 and what Trotsky also argued even after that.
Einde O'Callaghan
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] If Marxism is a Science then itsPredictions ShouldMatter..., (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]