Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] RE:It's those damn petty-bourgeois at it again!
- To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Marxism] RE:It's those damn petty-bourgeois at it again!
- From: Einde O'Callaghan <einde@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 02:43:31 +0100
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
dwalters@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
My first two cents on this.
In the US, my encounter with, membership in, and observation of various
Trotskyist groups seems to boil down to this: groups with the "worker state"
position don't care about it's members that have "state cap" positions, for the
most part. Those that have "state cap" positions elevate this question to a
level that requires agreement with them before they can even join, at least it
used to be like this. Not sure what that means, but I always thought that
interesting.
I don't know about the ISO, David, but certainly my experience of the
IS/SWP is that adherence to state capitalism certainly isn't a
pre-condition of membership. It certainly wasn't in my own case. When I
joined the IS 30 years ago I had a fairly orthodox workers'statist
position on Russia and Eastern Europe, a hangover from my earliest
experiences with the Trotskyist movement, Gerry Healy's Socialist Labour
League - for my sins, I was a founder member of the Irish Healyite
organisation, called the League for a Workers' Vanguard at that time
(N.B. this wasn't the same organisation as the League for a Workers'
Republic, which was headed by Paddy Healy - no relation).
Another member of my first IS branch (who is still a member of the SWP)
even thought that Mao's China offered a possible model for socialist
development, particularly in underdeveloped countries. Over a period of
several years we both came to a more profound theoretical understanding
and both of us now have what you might call a more or less orthodox
"Cliffite" analysis - but even today there are several finer points
where you will find differences between leading theoreticians in the SWP
(e.g. some are much more "Trotskyist" than others!).
I think that there are certain ramifications for other political
questions that arise out of adopting a state capitalist position (e.g.
the centrality of working class SELF-emancipation), but when I talk to
people about joining Linksruck today I don't discuss Russia - or even
the GDR, although I live in the former territory of that state. I talk
about things like self-activity, organisation and responses to current
political issues, just as I always have since joining the IS 3 decades ago.
Einde O'Callaghan
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]